Make, do and get

Wow, photo with five womens on the left side. I'm writing about it first because many time photo was on the right side in my memories.

Order

Verb make is first, I know that it may: explanation or reason that include cause, especially bad.

Verbs do and get is second, and union between them.

Description

Include question with verb that define reverse order ... I'll get anithing. that is end of the previous unit where I was learning got, that is past form of get.

Get

It's for say about taking completed thing, without details. I can use verb get to define fact of this, action. It's equal verb buy if get + object.

I can use get + adjective that is mean become: angry, cold, late, better, bigger, bigger.

I can use get for other ... ! Omg, I can use get for all ... ! Can I use var get for all other?

But seriously better to look for a right things or relations firts. How to define them? I know about thertoric by modal verbs. Use get for anighing that I can have if I can say have got. Hmm ... no bad checking for.

• I get a good mark => I have/have got a good mark;
• I get a bad mark => I have/have got a bad mark;
• I get a letter => I have/have got a letter;
• I get some milk from the shoop => I have/have got some milk from the shop;
• I get a present => I have/have got a present;
• I get a text message => I have/have got a text message;

But adjective without object looks muddy ... out of common template without object ... They write it's mean become. I can say it's mean I'm ... or He's ... or They are ...

• I get angry => I have/have got angry;
• I get late => I have/have got late;
• I get older => I have/have got older;
• I get bigger => I have/have got bigger;
• I get cold =>
  

It isn't getting anithing without object but it's in the circulation.

Get else

• get dressed
• get on a bus
  
• get off a bus
• get back
• get a bus
• get a train
• get to school
• get home
• get lost
• get married

I can check all of them with have and have to for understand that I was getting or not.

Can I get married? Can I get back? Can I get a bus? ...

Relation and thing is possible to be in the end of the modal verbs rhetoric, but they named with noun. 

All adjectives and adverbs is for describe nouns, pronouns or verbs. But get a bus is mean travel into the bus ... Yes, I want to check it with have and have got again.

How to get description of the anithung? How to get angry? Did I get angry? ...

Do

While I'm traveling on the bus. I'm doing it. When I get angry. I'm doing this.

Make

Hm... I think anithing may making to be in owneship or for doing with. Also it may was making that I can't affect for, because I can get ill.

I'll have disease but will doing anithing in the order that is right when you know that you get cold.

Yes, It's easy to make dinner and have it. I can to say: I have got a dinner!

But get cold is about cause why I was getting disease. I can't having a cold, that was making by nature and when It's coming I must do anithing with.

It may named unwanted deal, maybe. That may include get up, get lost, get back ... 

TIP

I get home, but I get to school. That is to mean here?

 

Test

• You get a text message from a friend. Do you reply immideately?
• Yes: 5. Maybe: 3. No: 0.
• Your best friend has made a cake, but it tastes horrible. Do you tell him or her?
• Yes: 0. Maybe: 3. No: 5.
• Your best friend done something really stupid, and tells you about it. Do you tell your other friends?
• Yes: 0. Maybe: 0. No: 5.
• You helped your friend do her homework, and she gets a good mark. Do you tell the teacher?
• Yes: 0. Maybe: 0. No: 5.
• Your friend uses your phone and makes a lot of calls. Do you get angry?
• Yes: 3. Maybe: 3. No: 5. 
• Do you alsways get your friends a present on their birthday?
• Yes: 5. Maybe: 3. No: 3.

 

at first

I can get, do, make. It's abilities.

It described with modal verb can always. That define any how to for each time. It may be easy and no need to make it directly.

Verb do may take many different froms.

 

get for common

Verb get is right for any relations and things that I can have and say that I have got it.

• I get a text message from a friend.
  
• I get bicycle from the shop.
• I get present of my friend for the holiday.
• I get meet with my girlfriend.
• I get strawberry from my garden.
• I get good mark on the exam.
• I get married with my girlfriend.

 

get of reason

Verb get may be circumstance of the nature, anything. It mean become with adjective or adverb.

• I get cold at the evening yesterday.
• I get back to my old home.
• I get out of the car on the gas station.
• I get away of the street when rain coming.
• I get angry when didn't find my socks.
• I get better with English learn.
• I get fun from the last weekend.
• I get fine of different things for sometimes. 
• I get statification from different things for a while.
  

 

do for have ...

Verb do may used for many deals that I'm doing within getting but ...

• I'm traveling on the bus when I get a bus.
  
• I doing exercises from book for get knowledge.
  
• I'm shopping for get a bread.
• I'm washing to get clear.
• I was doing homework and get a good mark.
  

 

do for ...

Verb do may used for ...

• I'm doing nothing to get relax.
• I'm playing games to get fun.
• I'm reading news to get opinion pieces.
• I'm walking to get fine.
  

 

make for have

Verb make is right for say about producing something, when we use ability for make thing or relation.

• I make a cake.
• I make a friend.
  

How to

• I can use make for say about things producing or relation ... 
• I can use do for any else other.
• I can use get for say about: things, relations, anighing else.
• I can replace them for similar verbs.
  

Have and have got

It looks similar choose between present simple and present perfect. Because description as present perfect question: Have you got a favorite crocodile?

May be verb have is pivot point for them, when I can append got here for make sentense similar present perfect. How was it coming and present this choose for me?

If I set choose how it's in the title, two ways possible:

• If I choose have got, I'll be with Present Perfect.
• If I choose have, I'll be with Present Simple or any other tense.

 

Object

Only any object may be cause for this choose. Cause isn't good basis for begin anithing.

• If I can take order how this object was coming for, I can choose right.
• I may predict if I don't know about past ...  

I have ...

I can have:

• an anccident / a break / a rest / a sleep / a cold tea / coffee;  // ... ability
• breakfast / lunch / dinner;   // cooking ability
  
• a sandwich / a chat / a discussion / a talk fun / a good time / a nice day / a holiday / a shower / a bath / a swim / a run / a walk;  // ... ability

It's:

• It's right to be in the modal verbs rhetoric ...
  
• Also, have is ability too ...
• It's self things ... 
• It's ...

 

I have got ...

Hmm ... I'm thinking that I have got anything that created within any ability. Also, I can have it too, but different in the focus ...

Coffee is a good example. If I make coffee, I have it. Hmm ... But coffee include many components that isn't important here, because coffee is completed and self-sufficient thing.

I have got coffee in the cafe.

How to #1

• I can use have for anithing that of abilities in the completed rhetoric.
• It defined by any tenses, except Present Perfect.
  
• I can use have got for say that: I got it and I have it of the people who have ability for create it.
• It defined by Present Perfect tense.
• I'm looking for story about 60.000 crocodiles and understand that say have got must be right to set link for creators, who have ability
• have is ability too ... hm ... if I cook breakfast ... I can eat it or I can have it, may be so long how I can. I may say right: I have got breakfast by recipe ...
  

order is: ... => cooking breakfast => [have] or [have got] breakfast => ... 

History

 

The term verb is from the Latin verbum meaning word: hence it is the word of a sentence. A thought cannot be expressed without a verb.

 

When the child cries, "Apple!" it means, See the apple! or I have an apple! In the mariner's shout, "A sail!" the meaning is, "Yonder is a sail!"

Hence is explanation or reason that include cause, especially bad.

Verbs & how to #2

I'm thinking these verbs have and got, may be replaced for many verbs that is more right to using of conditions. Example: have researched, have finded, storage created, storage finded ...

 

The first is creating thing or relation how it defined of a minimum two first line of modal verbs rhetoric, the second line need for examination that it's allow for people, repeatable, exchangable', ...

 

... verb have is of ability. It may be defined in the all possible tenses each time.

 

Structure have got leaves only one tense, Present Perfect. It make link for the past for define how it was getting. I can use it at sometimes.

Hm ... If I got a smile, I have a smile. I have got a smile. But it's possible to be if I define this: I can have all that I can feel.

' It's more about famous people for relation. Do you like watch at the evening how do TV stars celebrate the new year together?

Be like and look like

I have two again within and union ... 

Oh yes, style of font in title is italics: be like and look like.

I'm thinking this is easy answers for difficult questions, as What ...

I can check my previous how to, that question who is possible for official personal name, first question on the picture may be confirm my fact.

Hmm ... I need any method to understand that confirm my facts or not ... 

What

And now I can continue with real core of this theme and two tools for.

But in the another style than many of themes.

Description

What does Wolverine look like?

Hmm... I can ask why is this question here? But I'll search cause for. Cause that is only one unit of any order. Order is on the picture below.

Hmm my conclusion of previous unit looks right.

Do I need it or I can use order. Hmm, it example where I can check how is it possible.

One way of ... when cause is here

 

 

He is on the picture and this is equal how I can watch it on the TV. This is cause. Question of the description is here, because we can wath it many times on the TV.

But without answer ... Yes, answer in the order, one answer without source. I can say that he is dark, want to fight, and look fashionable powerful.

I know that I really have only two ways. But! Hmm ... I know that they are predictible, real basis for them is only one in the past ... It's right when I use look like and be like.

Which way predictible for this? I'm thinking is possible to be like him while watch new films. And ... one moment here.

I finded this on this web site. Oh, they looks anyelse ... Also, I think he isn't here. It may be mistake, I don't know history of this comic story, but ... They looks how it was looking like in the past.

This is around of the first point in the past in the order. But current here is for the current reality. Is he example or is he collective image?

Hmmm ... If I'm begining from the cause and use why.

I can be on one place many years ... this image is live of.

It's loop when I find cause, I can provide upgrade for image. Also, I can search first point in the order or may move front for explorate Wolverine ...

One way of ... when order is

Ok. Cause in the past. I can look to the order.

In the order, I have official name for group of artistic characters. That may include real people for. I think it must be, but I can't find anithyng for ...

That is looking interest, they are named as group, not one or not many names. But does designer have to pain all of them on the magazine cover?

The second question using be like, for describe different between them and people. This is only one be like that define two second question with look like.

Wolverine have claws here for example, but I know he can and the last question with be like describe it ... 

Hmm ... this isn't story. This is question based story! Only questions define the next story's path ...

Question

Question on the bottom of image helpful for continuous, because it's request for take more about this character. It must be only one ... but what?

No answer, only two ways for describe this be like and look like.

Answer repeat previous, that helpful for stop this too.

Hmmm ... Two ways when nobody can't answer for what question one time.

Order again

Hm... Only one that I understand from the order, that It may be completed with questions. Question with what privide many different lines for.

Hmm ... I can use other that is the next in this book. But it'll decrease range of possible answers ... Hmm ... but ... so many of them will have imagine form only ...

Hmmm ... Where do I need it? May be right question here is Who, but no one real name here ...

Yes, it's place for fantasy, wihtout limits, place for different artistics methods in.

How to #1

• Who question for the object may be basis for future dialog.
  
• be like basis for object statement, look like description how it looks
• Order show that is right to be one by one, What question with answer as dialog, so long how many time people want to make it ... 
• Other verbs similar look is feel, taste, sound, smell like ... 

TIPs

What ... like? isn't the same How's ... ? But I know about it. Generally, we don't include word like into the answer.

Object and subject questions

I'm coming here from the link: See units 27 and 28 for Who ...? and What ...? questions.

• This is unit 27, do I have about who or about what in this unit?
• Title is about Object and subject quetions.
• But in the description I have question: Who studied at Hogwards?

 

Some changes in the order of picture. Question over the common picture. Do you know the answers to any of these questions?

 

• What happened on 24 august 79 AD? vesuvius eruption
  
• Who did Romeo love? Juliet
  
• Who studied at Hogwarts? Harry Potter
  
• What did sir Alexander Fleming discover in 1928? penicillin
  
• Who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington D.C.? US President
  
• What happens in the ninth month of the Muslim calendar? don't eat during Ramadan

 Answers

• First with What of nature affect, I think what is right to be here
• Second is people by Who is right
  
• Third is book character by Who, omg. how is it possible? Which or How
  
• Fourth with What for chemical compounds ... ok
  
• Five Who about the people, US President
• Sixth with What about the defined day for, but how is it possible? How
  

I'm looking for, this is not right to use Who for the not real people. Also, use What for any tradition of the any religion.

Five question don't include auxiliary verb does. This is statement of Present Simple without noun and with the ? in the end. How to understand it?

Focus on the verb lives here, that possible to exclude in the present simple questions, but it's here. Without real name! And also with the question.

Omg, all say that I must to check who was US Presindent. Do I need it ... Ok. I'm going to read about this man ... George Washington is first president of the US.

Which of facts I must read? ... Oh, it's only first, present simple isn't set accent for the any time. How many presidents biographies do I must know? Oh, I understand ... no one, it isn't question ...

But George Washington was a Founding Father of The United States, military officer, and planter ...

They write that it's right, but no here. It must be in past tense with date for be usable!

Who and What

 

What is right for all of the nature, Who when it's people.

 

Hmmm ... Who is my cat? or What is my cat?

Only three questions without doubt, but no animals, pets here ...

Who again 

 

• Can I check that Romeo and Juliet was being real people?
• Can I say that Harry Potter was being only in imaginations?

Hm ... I'm thinking about "instruction" for right using who again ... But I must take facts. Facts about question for the object and subject.

Different

• Who did John Lennon marry in 1969?
• He married Yoko Ono.
• What does she want?
• She wants a new car.

 

• Who discoverend penicillin?
• Alexander Flemming discovered pinicillin.
• What happend in november in the US?
• Thanksgiving.
  

• Who lives at number 42?
• Elena and Chris. // They live at number 42.
  

I don't see on this page nothing about the future and present. I don't see no one question who for the real person! Only one about an US presidents ... who is president in the five question?

 

Yes, they write about in the answers, but without real name ... No name here ... no one name of the WHO question! But it's for the facts that everyone should know!

Only question what is possible here ... I'm was learning another question and know about better questions for any things.

Hmmm ...

 

What is common set in my opinion. Who is subset of What. We use who include First name and Second name.

 

It isn't important. Object and subject questions is important here.

They are isn't so many different.

No auxiliary verb in subject questions. One different.

Conclusions ... Facts ...

• Who is only about First Name and Second Name, may not about people.
• Question What is first that I may use if Who isn't possible.

Oh, Do I need ask about no people? Harry Potter for example. I know that Harry Potter is character who was creating by J.K. Rowling.

 

Order needed for make this. Order for art character creation. Question Who isn't right here in my opinion.

It looks as order for question if anithing allow them for.

• No auxiliary verb in subject questions.
• TIP: In subject questions verb is singular for 3th person, e.g. or always.

It's looks as some details for these questions. No tense marker always. I save modified verb in question, that is excluding in all other grammar terms.

 

How will it be for 3th person question with we or they, where it isn't possible anywhere!

 

Yes, in the subject questions in Present Simple I send verbs with mods for anybody in question! Only one that I understand here, that I must ask who competent in this qeustion!

 

Except Present Perfect ... may it possible here? Book isn't present Present Perfect here ... Who discovered penicillin? Is it Present Perfect or Past Simple? Hmm they didn't write about PP.

 

I can use it or not I look ...

 

• Who did John Lennon marry in 1969?
• He married Yoko Ono.
• Who married John Lennon in 1969? // question about legal state
  
• Yoko Ono married John Lennon in 1969.
  

 

Omg, yes I can use two, each time I can use one that I want to use ...

How to

• I can use subject question if competent people have to answer me or I can answer.
  
• I may use object question if ... 
• I can use who for question in official personal name.
• I may use what or alternative rhetoric ... 

Are these facts?

Question words: Where? When? Why? How? Whose?

I'm looking for title and I see key words for question. They are include order:

• Where? ask about place ...
  
• When? ask about time ...
  
• Why? ask about reason ...
  
• How? ask about order or formula ...
  
• Whose? ask about basis of owneship ...
  

Place. What is the place? Place is planet earth, water or ground, free or by legal, ... oh I have so many different place now and can continue ... 

Hm ... When is the second ... Need to set time for. It's easy because we have one method for.

Wow, but now cause coming ... reason ... I'm thinking I must exclude it, will be better to use order ... But it's in the second question! Because cause is only one step in the any long order ...

If I ask about cause ... I can take little piece of any person, that may be need or not .... Hm. Yes, I can use it, but don't focus on this ... Also, it may be different of different peoples. Many defenitions must be ... analized for exclude mistakes.

Causes, reasons ... Oh, Do you know about combinatorics? It can help for make many of them ... millions of them ... billions of them ...

Order or formula. At this moment I have place, time, which of orders is right here or may be formula? Oh, yes, I have many conditions at this moment for say it right ...

Whose? question ... owneship ...

Auxiliary verb

Example present three: will, are, did. Hmm ... No another here, only three.

• Basic for future, that I know is common for prediction in the completed retoric about future;
• be verb form for check anithing or anibody. But focus on the are, what is right for you, we, they. I can take personal opinion or opinion of group of peoples;
• did for the questions about past;
  

Whose

Can be before singular or plural nouns, may be about people, animals or things. Unit number 50 will show more ... I'll learn it in the future again.

Indirect order for the past

• Whose? ask about basis of owneship ... 
• How? ask about order or formula ... 
• Why? ask about reason ... 
• When? ask about time ... 
• Where? ask about place ...

Oh, I have a problem here =( I'll learn whose only on the level 50, but now I can't do it completely ...

Only one that I understand right it's that this was so many time ago. Whose question for it provide answer about body who owner is man. And in the last question, we can understand that now it in the museum, but it's place, museum isn't owner.

Yes, unit 50 is first for reading before continue.

... 

for continue ...

...

Question

Hmm ... But question present version that farmer may killed this man ... Why do they write that this fact may be lie? Yes, I know that question why no right, it's one piece of any order ... And here, I don't know this cause or reason ...

Which is different between kill or find corpse?

Hmm ... Do you know?

Description take tip: How did hi die?

 

Yes / no questions and short answers

Title looks good. I think it say that all that I need for right answers. If I can take yes without doubt it's good or I must do more ...

Which is common, this question is describe in mathematics as true / false, boolean. Possible only one answer, no exceptions. Any expression will give true or false.

It looks as Yes or don't ask or make short answers ... ! Yes, these questions may be difficult, but in mathematics they are easy.

Target

I have template in the header of this blog. Hmm ... I think each unit of the template may be target for this question ... Hmm ...

Three or five question

Picture include only five questions and table include tree ... Yes, if I have a sentesnse, I can ask about each of it unit. But I don't need it when I have sentence ... 

Hm ... 

Nouns, pronouns, adjectives, verbs, adverbs. I know five, but I know that it isn't all, possible to write them as three ...

When I look for the third question I thinking that it's wrong ... I need make sentence for make question ... Hmm ... But will be better to do it in the right order ... But I must be careful.

In order [1]

Are beetles important? Yes, they are!

Oh, I read it and thinking about sentence: Beetles are important. No object here ... Hmm ... but this is answer in sedcription, that confirmed again on the picture. Dr. Stephen Elliot tells about ...

I understand that he is doctor, he can understand it. He say yes, but why? Because people often ask him ... 

Oh, he say that it's no completely question, but I think he can append may be no object here.

But why? Oh, yes, because when I don't know but I want to understand ... And I'm doing first step ... 

Do anybody ask for .... fun? Why fun isn't right cause?

May be it's common of these questions ...  They are need for easy question, when I know only description but need answers for confirm this.

How ...

What ?can I think if I'm listening that ... beetles are important ... Hmm ... Nothink, I don't like etymology. But when I like to check that it's true, I have doubt about that speaker say ... 

Because he don't say about object. Hmm ... what is basis here: doubt about speaker or interest of etymology?

Doctor saw that it's often. How is basis come here? It was spreading of information soruce.

Hmm ... Doctor think that common function of beetles is eat dead plants and animals. Hmm ... Wow but bacteria can do it ... Can bacteria do it without negative affect for?

It looks right for understanding and information spreading wasn't wrong ... Hm, etymology isn't popular, but hides secrets, I think. Bacteria is dangerous friend, how is hyena too.

Which animals does eat dead plant? Oh, I don't know ... Is bacteria animal?

Chain intro ...

I'm thinking about yes / no answers and understand that it's provide "chain" of information, I can make complete story ...

That is looking interesting. I can use various ways ... I was coming for question about bacteria, also I may use way for know anithing about speaker, the Doctor, or anithing else ... 

Hm, I feel that this easy unit include no one model. But may be it's lie. Chain is one of them ... That may is lie, no feeels here, it's only affect of picture that include it.

But that looks right, these question is method of logic, that prvode commications between events, facts, messages, etc. When I don't have completed text, this is helpful to make sentences by logic.

In order [2]

Oh. The second question from the picture is, Do beetles lay eggs? 

Omg, I thinking how to move from first question to the second ... yes, eggs in the right side of the picture. May be possible to know it from the equal picture if I don't have doubt about speaker and really like to know more about etymology.

Do you really like this? Yes, this is connection between two question that is hidden here ... 

Conclusions: no connect between first and second question without picture on the right side.

Subject or object learn

I'm looking for picture of adult beetle and thining about the research that is possbile with this method.

I can use research tree for different ways of my research, where wrong branches will be end as no answers.

Maybe repeating of the question will fix it, may be not.

Where answer is yes, and this works ... Hmm ... It may be right way ... 

In order [3]

Third question include additional sentence before. This question masn't be without it ... This is information about 350.000 species of beetle.

Answer for direct question: no, it isn't. Because doctor say that we can't find them all now. He didn't say about time limits for this too.

If I take any information, I can check it with question for competent people.

This is wrong way and I have no here, stop it.

In order [4]

I can ask Do the beetle live anywhere? that is predictible as question of many people. When I don't know about them nothing.

I'll continue to learn them when I like etymology.

He describe many places where beetles was living, may be, living now ... That they easy adapted almost every habitat. Hmm ... but isn't in the sea ... Hmm ...

Maybe doctor looks sea as another world ...

In order [5]

Last question Have beetles adapted to the Arctic? follow from the doctor previous answer. It's show that beetles is interest for.

It's question based on the Present Perfect time. I was describe how I look for it.

Statement: Beetles have adapted to the Arctic.

Attributes: positive, hidden, no predict, focus on the past.

Omg, it looks as very difficult task ... Only one that we have in the end ... way to the Arctic ... Wow.

Question

I can make additional question of information that doctor gave ... For make additional brunch ...

Chain & Learning

When I'm doing it, I can take only one result. It's completely defined ... .

Yes, only that is possible to be in the end is defined text by the rhetoric, that equal for many grammar units within logic connection in the right order.

Yes, it's the all that I can do. Nothing more. I must think about, I must go for. It may be no linear way, but it's only one possible result that may be different in their defenition.

Possible that rhetoric is no good idea or grammar units isn't complete or logic connection include mistakes in metdod, and order may be different.

But text will be.

350.000

How to take so many names? If I have one question with yes answer, I can take new name for beetle. Example: if any beetle hunt at the night. I can name him Night Hunter!

If I'll do the next question. Does he live in Africa? With answer yes. I can name him as African Night Hunter!

Omg, where is ends here? What is going on? How to be?

May more research need here for the common loop of their reproduction function?

TIP

Auxiliary verb must be for take yes answer right. I have only three here:

• be in three form for state
• do or does for present simple out of strict time point
• have or has for present with link for the past
  

It's say about the ... ways for take yes ansers only about that is important. No about past and other.

Modal of possibility: may, might

One different with modals for request in the preposition. They was forming from the events that isn't completely for the viewer. Oh yes, I know something about probability theory.

Only two here: may, might. May for higest probability first. Might for less second.

May be should include any probability too, when I don't know completely solution. I have a chance that it will wrong in the end.

The example about Russia show it. In Russia people can say "Don't whistle in a house", because they think money won't be.

If I'll use this as rule, I won't take any result. But really possible in Russia that money won't be and whistle isn't cause ... 

In the 2024, must be right to look not ?for a cause. Right word for begins is владелец if you like to understand it. Because право собственности completely present before.

Is it duplicate of ownership?

Description

We may never know ...

Could

It used for say about probability too. Also, it's past form of can, when we can say was/were able to, we don't have a person.

Book say about order for may, might ... but nothing about could and they don't say about should, it's my looking.

Remember

• I must use it in right order: can, could, be able to
• When I take any ability completely, requests is possible here, I must check it: can, could, may. Is it work predictible and right? I musn't do it, I can test it before, I think.
  
• This define real basis for must, have to and can't for determine legal basis. I must remember that can't here for stop it when need, because ability may include unpredictible problem, legal basis may be wrong at sometimes.
  
• Should, ought to will be ... If they unmarked ... Maybe, I must thinking about legal basis first.
  
• I must be careful with could when it out of complete order. When I see it, I must be careful.
  
• I can use may, might when I don't know full information and maybe can't take it.

Probability is possible of each modal verb, but in the right order possible to control it.

Oh, yes, I know without it, that probability is right way when you are begin anything. But it's don't work for get real result ... Impossible to use it, will be right to exclude it, fill empty rows ... 

Probability will go away ... will be 100%, when I ?can exclude word probability out of my speech.

Important

Oh, I think needed to repeat. I must be careful with could out of the right order.

Knowledge

• Oh, I can't take it from the ... stories about Yeti ... when might work.
• What is second type of knowledge by may?
  

But answer for the question in the end of picture: we don't know. It's good for anything else ... for story about Yeti ... as example.

May

• May isn't mixing with not. May and not must be apart.
• Modal verb may set accent that probability is here, but without numerics.
  
• Maybe is adverb ... is different here? Mark verb previously or describe verb in any place?
• Book show only one example use it in the begining of the sentense.
  

How to #1

I can use may ... when I don't know about result of the verb using. When I don't have to finish this directly. Example: if anybody wash the dishes, I can say: hmm ... He may finish it or not ...

When I don't know real bais, legal basis ... If probability will decrase I may use might. No numerics here, only two basis, ability, etc from the previous description.

Try to calculate

Around 100% probability is working modal requests of legal basis based on the real basis by right ability. I'm about full order ... Hmm ... how to transform it into the numerisct ... 

Oh, it's possible but need time ... Probability theory show simple rule for dependent events, I can use plus between them.

Oh, but plus it's only one that I remember, because it likely for independents events more time ...

Hmmm do this numerics is need here? Yes, it will be one numerics about long, difficult order. That is common here, will be very difficult to exctract text from this numeric ... Yes. Possible to make it again in indirect order ...

But why I need it? Only when I have many, many events ... for statistics ... Oh, I can use:

Probability = Favourable Outcome / Possible Outcome

Only one times I may need to calculate this when I want to use it as numeric for communicate with people who want to take numeric.

Oh, I tried, but I forget formulas now. Yes, It's possible easy, but don't need now.

When

Hmm ... when I have many results of order when I use modal rights, I can transform it into the probability for make rate to show how each ability completed now.

If value is low, it's very uncmpleted ability. If value is high it's very completed ability ... 

Hmm ... no bad idea ... But this numeric isn't define abilities completely to. One numeric is't mark.

Numerics is good when I need compare anithing ... 

For example: I have five apples. I know their weight. If need compare them, I can make table and sort them by weight. It's easily than work with real apples each time ...

Also, maybe rate by numerics of uncompleted learn of any ability ... 

How to #2

 

• may if I don't know possibility, but wish ...
• might if it's fantastic to be true