Common template

singular adjective Subject [alternative for adverb]
Verb [reference] singular adjective Object(s), adverb

Wednesday, 11 December 2024

Yes / no questions and short answers

Title looks good. I think it say that all that I need for right answers. If I can take yes without doubt it's good or I must do more ...

Which is common, this question is describe in mathematics as true / false, boolean. Possible only one answer, no exceptions. Any expression will give true or false.

It looks as Yes or don't ask or make short answers ... ! Yes, these questions may be difficult, but in mathematics they are easy.

Target

I have template in the header of this blog. Hmm ... I think each unit of the template may be target for this question ... Hmm ...

Three or five question

Picture include only five questions and table include tree ... Yes, if I have a sentesnse, I can ask about each of it unit. But I don't need it when I have sentence ... 

Hm ... 

Nouns, pronouns, adjectives, verbs, adverbs. I know five, but I know that it isn't all, possible to write them as three ...

When I look for the third question I thinking that it's wrong ... I need make sentence for make question ... Hmm ... But will be better to do it in the right order ... But I must be careful.

In order [1]

Are beetles important? Yes, they are!

Oh, I read it and thinking about sentence: Beetles are important. No object here ... Hmm ... but this is answer in sedcription, that confirmed again on the picture. Dr. Stephen Elliot tells about ...

I understand that he is doctor, he can understand it. He say yes, but why? Because people often ask him ... 

Oh, he say that it's no completely question, but I think he can append may be no object here.

But why? Oh, yes, because when I don't know but I want to understand ... And I'm doing first step ... 

Do anybody ask for .... fun? Why fun isn't right cause?

May be it's common of these questions ...  They are need for easy question, when I know only description but need answers for confirm this.

How ...

What ?can I think if I'm listening that ... beetles are important ... Hmm ... Nothink, I don't like etymology. But when I like to check that it's true, I have doubt about that speaker say ... 

Because he don't say about object. Hmm ... what is basis here: doubt about speaker or interest of etymology?

Doctor saw that it's often. How is basis come here? It was spreading of information soruce.

Hmm ... Doctor think that common function of beetles is eat dead plants and animals. Hmm ... Wow but bacteria can do it ... Can bacteria do it without negative affect for?

It looks right for understanding and information spreading wasn't wrong ... Hm, etymology isn't popular, but hides secrets, I think. Bacteria is dangerous friend, how is hyena too.

Which animals does eat dead plant? Oh, I don't know ... Is bacteria animal?

Chain intro ...

I'm thinking about yes / no answers and understand that it's provide "chain" of information, I can make complete story ...

That is looking interesting. I can use various ways ... I was coming for question about bacteria, also I may use way for know anithing about speaker, the Doctor, or anithing else ... 

Hm, I feel that this easy unit include no one model. But may be it's lie. Chain is one of them ... That may is lie, no feeels here, it's only affect of picture that include it.

But that looks right, these question is method of logic, that prvode commications between events, facts, messages, etc. When I don't have completed text, this is helpful to make sentences by logic.

In order [2]

Oh. The second question from the picture is, Do beetles lay eggs? 

Omg, I thinking how to move from first question to the second ... yes, eggs in the right side of the picture. May be possible to know it from the equal picture if I don't have doubt about speaker and really like to know more about etymology.

Do you really like this? Yes, this is connection between two question that is hidden here ... 

Conclusions: no connect between first and second question without picture on the right side.

Subject or object learn

I'm looking for picture of adult beetle and thining about the research that is possbile with this method.

I can use research tree for different ways of my research, where wrong branches will be end as no answers.

Maybe repeating of the question will fix it, may be not.

Where answer is yes, and this works ... Hmm ... It may be right way ... 

In order [3]

Third question include additional sentence before. This question masn't be without it ... This is information about 350.000 species of beetle.

Answer for direct question: no, it isn't. Because doctor say that we can't find them all now. He didn't say about time limits for this too.

If I take any information, I can check it with question for competent people.

This is wrong way and I have no here, stop it.

In order [4]

I can ask Do the beetle live anywhere? that is predictible as question of many people. When I don't know about them nothing.

I'll continue to learn them when I like etymology.

He describe many places where beetles was living, may be, living now ... That they easy adapted almost every habitat. Hmm ... but isn't in the sea ... Hmm ...

Maybe doctor looks sea as another world ...

In order [5]

Last question Have beetles adapted to the Arctic? follow from the doctor previous answer. It's show that beetles is interest for.

It's question based on the Present Perfect time. I was describe how I look for it.

Statement: Beetles have adapted to the Arctic.

Attributes: positive, hidden, no predict, focus on the past.

Omg, it looks as very difficult task ... Only one that we have in the end ... way to the Arctic ... Wow.

Question

I can make additional question of information that doctor gave ... For make additional brunch ...

Chain & Learning

When I'm doing it, I can take only one result. It's completely defined ... .

Yes, only that is possible to be in the end is defined text by the rhetoric, that equal for many grammar units within logic connection in the right order.

Yes, it's the all that I can do. Nothing more. I must think about, I must go for. It may be no linear way, but it's only one possible result that may be different in their defenition.

Possible that rhetoric is no good idea or grammar units isn't complete or logic connection include mistakes in metdod, and order may be different.

But text will be.

350.000

How to take so many names? If I have one question with yes answer, I can take new name for beetle. Example: if any beetle hunt at the night. I can name him Night Hunter!

If I'll do the next question. Does he live in Africa? With answer yes. I can name him as African Night Hunter!

Omg, where is ends here? What is going on? How to be?

May more research need here for the common loop of their reproduction function?

TIP

Auxiliary verb must be for take yes answer right. I have only three here:

  • be in three form for state
  • do or does for present simple out of strict time point
  • have or has for present with link for the past

It's say about the ... ways for take yes ansers only about that is important. No about past and other.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Plural nouns