Present simple #1: statements

•  by Cambrige University Press book 2011;
• by An English Grammar by W.M. BASKERVILL & J.W. SEWELL 1895;
• About me here;
• by Cambridge dictionary too;

Hmm... I'm going to learn first statement of present tense. But I got maybe under title at first. Wow it's nice. I haven't began statement but I have probability after less than one minute. Oh.

But I must remember what it's about present simple! It don't include conditions about time.

Maybe

Oh. All here will be under the maybe slogan. Hmm... all pictures about girls for boys. But where is it for girls? Do girls know anithing? Hm... It's interesting... 

Do they want beautiful boys? What do they want? Hmm... I know one film "What women want". This question is difficult, but cinema production try to make answer.

"What men want" is the second film, budget say what more women's secrets is more popular that men's secrets.

Oh. But I know what all secrets is interestion only when they are secrets. It determine cause why girls on the picture.

Girls like it, it's popular. Also, I won't search answer for break secret. Secret will be wrong when it has broken =/ What is the secret here? Do you ready for it?

Know

It's more funny than all what I know from this book. lol. How is it possbile to know girl who is model for photo where I'm or anybody learn English by this book???

Omg.

About

I read text about Layla. Oh, yes, I don't know her. It's impossible really. But if I'll think about girls and exlcude mathematics, chance may be increase. But mathematics say it's really no chance.

Yes, 0.000000001% possible, but is it important?

Only content makers know Layla if story about her is true.

Present Simple, statements

Oh. I understand more what is Present Simple ... Crude title is official here.

Yes. It's possible, but present simple statements don't present accuracy information.

Predictable what question will present equal results.

A sssssssnake never sleepsssssss

 

Omg. What is it? It's mystery. I copy it from book, because I like this mystery. Hm ...

Hm ... It's a key for understand s ... Better will be do it in the right order. Step by step.

• It's about verb. Action.
  
• It's about changes for action by append s in the end.
  
• It's only small marker ... easy to skip it ...
  
• It's need when I look for the action as 3th person!
• Example is making strong focus on the begin of subject and to the end of verb.
• It's about subject what I choose and about that will be in the end of the action... 
• I must be carefull with snakes... Snakes never sleeps.

Conclusion: focus on the subject will be helpful. Check what is it, who is he or she. Before ... What is will result?

How to

 

Yes. I have filter for all ends. It's a good news. Do I need all of them? I have nice filter here. Can I use verbs with only simple ends? If I can, obligations to write it right won't be my, but I'll lose ... 

 

What do I lose? I'll lose only opportunity say about people or it my opinion about how they do anithing. But only for strict list of verbs.

 

But It won't be accuracy, only maybe right, because it's present simple, only.

 

Is it important to use all verbs? Do I need learn by heart all of them? Hm... It looks no predictable easy ...

Table, hmm...

• If end is -o, -ch, -sh, -ss, -x => add es;
• If end is consonant + -y => drop -y and add -ies;
• if end is vovel + -y => add -s only;
• have => he has;

OMG!

Omg! I think what I need exclude these rules ... Because it isn't important. I can use better tenses to say accuracy about anithing.

I'll remember them while reading or listening sources who write by grammar terms right.

It isn't one obligation to write it right, it's about possible obligations to take anithing what I don't need.

Yeah, Yeah. I must be careful. It's English languange. When does present simple look good? When nobody can't say or write better ...

 

 

Conclusion

 

Yes. Scheme works. But I have problem with another ways ... When I can say It works, I lose competent people and will do anithing without ability ... Wow.

I see it isn't good out of grammar. But it's easy for begining ...

 

Examples

 

I can use be for replace it. If difficult to find verb, will be easily to say about state by use famous word or term.

It's previous theme. Easy, but it works NO => it simple grammar knowledge. Don't use verb where will be better to use noun.

 

Difference in the word type. I can get noun what is nearly for constant easily than verb that nearly for the action. Action is more difficult for predict.

If I like to say: He make anithing wrong. NO! Will be better to say only his public statements, refuse of searching the verb or don't do anithing.

Has

It's exceptional for it. Verb will change for uncommon and understandable state.

How to

It isn't bad to begin, usually. I use present simple statements when I don't have another better quality. Exclude it when -s needed. Verb be is the right alternative for present simple with a famous or accurate object. I can use the object again as the subject.