Modal of possibility: may, might

One different with modals for request in the preposition. They was forming from the events that isn't completely for the viewer. Oh yes, I know something about probability theory.

Only two here: may, might. May for higest probability first. Might for less second.

May be should include any probability too, when I don't know completely solution. I have a chance that it will wrong in the end.

The example about Russia show it. In Russia people can say "Don't whistle in a house", because they think money won't be.

If I'll use this as rule, I won't take any result. But really possible in Russia that money won't be and whistle isn't cause ... 

In the 2024, must be right to look not ?for a cause. Right word for begins is владелец if you like to understand it. Because право собственности completely present before.

Is it duplicate of ownership?

Description

We may never know ...

Could

It used for say about probability too. Also, it's past form of can, when we can say was/were able to, we don't have a person.

Book say about order for may, might ... but nothing about could and they don't say about should, it's my looking.

Remember

• I must use it in right order: can, could, be able to
• When I take any ability completely, requests is possible here, I must check it: can, could, may. Is it work predictible and right? I musn't do it, I can test it before, I think.
  
• This define real basis for must, have to and can't for determine legal basis. I must remember that can't here for stop it when need, because ability may include unpredictible problem, legal basis may be wrong at sometimes.
  
• Should, ought to will be ... If they unmarked ... Maybe, I must thinking about legal basis first.
  
• I must be careful with could when it out of complete order. When I see it, I must be careful.
  
• I can use may, might when I don't know full information and maybe can't take it.

Probability is possible of each modal verb, but in the right order possible to control it.

Oh, yes, I know without it, that probability is right way when you are begin anything. But it's don't work for get real result ... Impossible to use it, will be right to exclude it, fill empty rows ... 

Probability will go away ... will be 100%, when I ?can exclude word probability out of my speech.

Important

Oh, I think needed to repeat. I must be careful with could out of the right order.

Knowledge

• Oh, I can't take it from the ... stories about Yeti ... when might work.
• What is second type of knowledge by may?
  

But answer for the question in the end of picture: we don't know. It's good for anything else ... for story about Yeti ... as example.

May

• May isn't mixing with not. May and not must be apart.
• Modal verb may set accent that probability is here, but without numerics.
  
• Maybe is adverb ... is different here? Mark verb previously or describe verb in any place?
• Book show only one example use it in the begining of the sentense.
  

How to #1

I can use may ... when I don't know about result of the verb using. When I don't have to finish this directly. Example: if anybody wash the dishes, I can say: hmm ... He may finish it or not ...

When I don't know real bais, legal basis ... If probability will decrase I may use might. No numerics here, only two basis, ability, etc from the previous description.

Try to calculate

Around 100% probability is working modal requests of legal basis based on the real basis by right ability. I'm about full order ... Hmm ... how to transform it into the numerisct ... 

Oh, it's possible but need time ... Probability theory show simple rule for dependent events, I can use plus between them.

Oh, but plus it's only one that I remember, because it likely for independents events more time ...

Hmmm do this numerics is need here? Yes, it will be one numerics about long, difficult order. That is common here, will be very difficult to exctract text from this numeric ... Yes. Possible to make it again in indirect order ...

But why I need it? Only when I have many, many events ... for statistics ... Oh, I can use:

Probability = Favourable Outcome / Possible Outcome

Only one times I may need to calculate this when I want to use it as numeric for communicate with people who want to take numeric.

Oh, I tried, but I forget formulas now. Yes, It's possible easy, but don't need now.

When

Hmm ... when I have many results of order when I use modal rights, I can transform it into the probability for make rate to show how each ability completed now.

If value is low, it's very uncmpleted ability. If value is high it's very completed ability ... 

Hmm ... no bad idea ... But this numeric isn't define abilities completely to. One numeric is't mark.

Numerics is good when I need compare anithing ... 

For example: I have five apples. I know their weight. If need compare them, I can make table and sort them by weight. It's easily than work with real apples each time ...

Also, maybe rate by numerics of uncompleted learn of any ability ... 

How to #2

 

• may if I don't know possibility, but wish ...
• might if it's fantastic to be true
  

Should, ought to

The title set order, should is first. But I have problems at the begin. I know four units of previous:

• rules and laws
  
• feels
  
• obligation ?around people or basis (circumstance)
• allowed quality of possible ability (in range [0 .. 1) as Q)

Must include first and second, that define how to use it. Rules and laws is constant at any time, but feels may change. Hm ... 

First term: Should has a similar meaning to must, but is not so strong. They was writing it by present simple with one verb that is exceptions.

Yes, I'm thinking about that feels may be different, but is it only one that may be different? Law may be changeble, slowly, predictible for each place, but isn't constant.

feels ... should (must) ... rules and laws

When? What is measure for feels? Hmm ... funny, but may be feel is measure for feels. Yes, I must feel that is right each time must or should, when it's about rules and laws. But I must check how book present this ...

For listener or for reader

• Reader think that any law or rule is important:
  
• if I say: I must ... => He can understand that I feel.
  
• if I say: I should ... => He can understand nothing!
• Reader think that any law or rule isn't important:
• if I say: I must ... => He can understand that this rule or law is important for me.
  
• if I say: I should ... => He can understand nothing!

This is indirect way to say about anithing, it isn't helpful for result too.

Probability

It isn't full but easy to understand that should is about probability. No one of examples before don't include 100% confidence about speaker opinion who use should.

If anybody say should, will be difficult to take his opinion completely.

ought to 

 

Hm, rare version, equal version. How does use it? When ... or How does understand it?

Question

In the question, we have alternative for should, it's bad idea. This is idea(!) in South Korea, they didn't do it before ... !

But maybe, many of them was thinking so many years that must take off their shoes in restaurant. It maybe how a law in South Korea.

How to

Use for say about anithing that out of range, but it's important, because ... . Basis from have to return, again ... Why do I need anithing without it?

Should is helpful for set accent, show where I'm, that in my hands. This is first, important, stage when I take information.

If I must do anithing ... I must name this right.

Intro

 

Here are some thing you should remember

if you go to different countries.

 

I have any things that authors write, because they know about any basis in different countries. That haven't defined completely ... 

 

They have it, but don't know how to describe it right with must, have to, can't or present it as task.

At first needed, define right who can define each of these story about different countries in alternative formal state.

 

But no for myself, for undefined person who can, that include me too. Who is? It's anibody who learn English on the level A1.

People who know how to use must, have to, can't,

 will define this easy. Modal verbs may, might

are in the next unit, I can't use them.

 

That determine without knowledge about

culture of each contry or tips I can't do this. 

I can spend time for search tips how it was

for South Korea or don't continue.

Second picture, Russia

 

In Russian you shouldn't whistle inside a house.

(No one knows why!)

I from Russia and I don't know any legal basis when I musn't do this.

Who can know? Anybody who can read Constitution and understand that it's completely legal basis without details for each people.

But who isn't alone have to know of, have to be for, with this noice. I'm not feeling this good, this is a noice in my opinion.

Description

You should take off your shoes.

Yes, I'm doing this at home. Is it ability? Will be better to begin from the feels and must. I must take off my shoes at home!

Yes. It's legal at my home. I can set rules here.

How to

• I'm using should for mark anithing that is important in some opinion, for show it obvious if.
• I'm using ought to rare for ...
  

Must, have to and can't

Only two units here, where must is first, have to and can't - second. Ok, I'll try to understand must first, because ... I see ten terms here = ( Oh, difficult. I'm begining from the pictures.

• One include must;
• One include double must not;
  

The first about feeling that I can't easy understand ... I must wipe my feet before I walk out into it. Into the first bit of the morning ... May be she were feeling it ... But I can't understand it. One must for say how or what I feel.

First must not he saw, second must not fairy saw. But both in his mind ... Only one is different here pronoum. He wasn't imagine fairy who saw first time, but was doing it second time. This is about rules or law, when he can do it easy, he saw of his person:

• Each children can easy say that must no sleep, because it's rule for childrens, often;
• But difficult to stop cry, anobody need for help, because it's about feeling that needed rules for control it. It may be undercontrol. He don't like this that is cause for;
  

feel or not

When he can do it easy, he used must not for himself easy. But when he need help, must not coming from the alternative reality ... But not from the law or rules, because he is children and don't know about. But he can imagine it for himself for take rule ... 

Hmm .. Only one hitch here, it's hidden instruction for childrens by Lewis Carroll, no true. Did you have a imaginary friend when you was children?

First term include: rules and laws, feels. Second include: must not for say about that we are not allowed to do.

Where is border between rule or law and feels? Hm ...

rule

Simple rule: wash your hands before eating. What is vs. this rule? Only feels may be here. But I feel that it's true, I must wash my hands before eating.

No contradiction here between feels and rule. They are both lead in the some direction, for equal result.

feels

She saw about feel that difficult to understand ... Why? Impossible to take pair rule for it ... But do it need? Hm ... 

Use must when #1

• I have rule => feel not like
• I have rule => feel like
  
• I feel => rule not like
• I feel => rule like
• I feel => impossible to set rule
  
• I have rule => impossible to feel this
• I feel => undefined
  
• I have rule => undefine

I can use must when it will take result, that I think is possible by red terms. Hmm ... Also, rule is law here for simplify this. They together by and union in this context.

have to and can't, when #2

hm .. It may be similar for must, but I must replace feel for. I feel. It was writing in the third term, yes, will be better to use it. Also, cannot is here:

• I have rule => obligation of ... not like
• I have rule => obligation of ... like
• Obligation of ... => rule not like
• Obligation of ... => rule like
• Obligation of ... => impossible to set rule
  
• I have rule => obligation of ... is impossible here
  
• I have obligation of ... => undefined
  
• I have rule => undefine

I'm append

Poems, how to #3

People tell you all the time, poem do not have to rhyme.
It's often better if ?(they)people don't and I'm determined this one won't.

... for I cannot go with you, as I have to stay here.

• He cannot => He have obligation of ... OR What is the rule here? OR What does he feel?

Intrudcuction, again

Four units here:

• cannot it's of can of ability;
• have to is of the obligation of people as first or of circumstance;
  
• feels;
  
• rules and laws;

Yes, but in title I have comma between must and have to with cannot. Can I write and between them? I'm looking for example where is only feel, no need more, first poem, it's free of other:

You must wipe your feet before you walk out into it.

Also, nothing about can of ability in title, only can't. Also, nothing about ability here, she is about feels. But if feels is so easy and no need additional description, why are feels isn't ability?

Yes, it's ability I think with large amount of experience. First poem include ability that is cause because can't no need here ... 

I can use them completely, but only in order that present in the title.

Description

I have to stay here.

How can I understand this? How does it help for finish model for this unit? It isn't rule or law that I know. It isn't obligation of anibody, because I don't know about from the poem. He don't saw about feels. But he saw about ability.

He cannot go with.

He can stay, he can walk too ... But not with! Why is focus on the ability here? It's a mirrror of first poem where I know about her feels, I have end here and I don't know where is cause: order of possible events that I know ... 

Orders or tree or ...

Which is model right here? It's different combinations of basis variables with any formal variable for mark it each time. Hmm ... may be it's all that is needed ...

Variables, basis, it's common real units that provide all:

• rules and laws
  
• feels
  
• obligation ?around people or basis (circumstance)
• allowed quality of possible ability (in range [0 .. 1) as Q)
  

 

Variables, formal, only how to define or describe it:

• must, no forms
  
• can or cannot or couldn't for past
  
• have to, markers:
  
• don't for negative
• had to, past form
  
• didn't have to, past negative form
• will have to, future form
• do or does, questions 

 

How to, finally #1

I have many possible orders, when I can use different units, but some simple for using:

• I have rule => feel like [must]
  
• I feel => rule like [must]
  
• I feel => impossible to set rule [must]
  
• I feel => undefined, for seach ability [must]
• Obligation of/for people or basis => Which ability is right here? [have to]
  
• I have ability on right quality => I have to ... a job [have to]
  
• I don't understand anithing => I cannot [can't]
  

Also, I can use more difficult:

• I have rule => feel don't like => I have ability on right quality => obligation around basis => I have to make anithing ... // example how to do anithing if I can on any place, may be call a doctor when anibody like wrong
  

It's example, but possible many orders of this and I don't know all of them, isn't easy to describe all of them. Also, difficult filter them ...

To be continues ... 

Right prepositions need for obligation unit, that I can learn again and repeat it ...May be anything else.

Question

Which poem is about being far away from someone you love?

P.S.

Must defined of real legal basis and feels that is really affect from TV where I was watching the biatlon ... It's example what is may be feel when I don't know what is it, but feel it ... Because I forget about, It was so far in the past. But my brain remember it ... No wrong how is feels may be ...

How to, finally #2

 

• I'm using must for terms included conditions & rules or law & completed ability & feeling like together in the any measure fully.
  
• I'm using have to for communicate obligations of real basis of people that is true within anibody who must do it.
  
• I'm using can't if understanding that is impossible to execute have to, that define any thing(s) is absent.
  

 

 

Modal for requests: can, could, may

Hm, now modals is plural noun. They are formed for requests.

They are in the focus here, nothing more, only they are. How to use them for requests?

Can, could, may ... 

Order

They are sorted by frequensy of using them ... hm. But I know that can is about ability when it for describe verb. It's only key for make request or to say easy, question.

I don't know about could now, formally, I didn't learn it. But I know that could is between can and may.

Possible for any place if I don't know how to be ... be or not to be. Yes, good question. When I don't know how to be, why I'm in this place?

Could

Hm, may be it is no bad measure for understand that I'm not on the place that is right for me.

May

May is like to be formal or polite with accent for it.

Can for give permissions ...

Hm... Can is about ability, when I say: Yes, you can. I say that: I think you can do this.

How to #1

• Can it's for ask and get permission. It looks good, but it say that when I ask, I don't know about my ability;
• Could for get permission, can for take. When I'm don't know that I need it ... Yes, if I can or can't,
  
• May for get, can for take permissions ... It's very polite, when I like it, when I can or I can't ...
  
• Can for ask, for ask polite ...
  
• Could for ask, when I don't know that I need it colpletely ...
  
• May for ask, for ask very polite ...
  
• Can for ask to do something. When I need to know that he or she can do it.
  
• Could for ask to do something, when I don't know that I need it ... 

How to #2

Could is the past of can mean of ability, no of person who was able to ... . May be could is right when I know about ability that was right, but don't sure now.

But I know that ability in the past is very reliable way to check, ... When I ask could, I must understand that this ability is allowed in the past.

Please

I can use it for set accent that I really need or need an attention of anibody. ...

Picture, example

• Claudia, a holiday: could for safari, can for take friends with.
  
• Charles, a car: can for take car model, could for take answer about possibility (yes/no).
  
• John, a job: could for a job in circus, may for show his video.
  
• Rita, a sister: may for a sister, could for her hair and eyes color.

I think red include mistakes, but no one examples with can with mistake. Can I try to find who can without limits?

 

How to #3

• I'm using could if I have a doubt, but know it was right ability in the past.
  
• I'm using can when it's about present.
• I'm using may when it's very polite, official, difficult, include large amount of experience.

 

Modal verbs: can, could, be able to

Omg. difficult title, I don't know about modal in description nothing. This word is first that say about type of it, define as adjective.

Yes, I know about verbs, thay may be with to, or include mods, or not, or anithing else ... But here, each verb have additional verb for describe. Yes, it looks as adverb before verb, not in the end of the sentense.

It's equal pair of adjective + noun, but show as modal + verb, no adverb in the end. English like to change order for better accent ... Yes, that provide good effect to take important from the description and set in in the front.

I think, it's good example when we can use this method for the verbs, where description of the verb is very important and must be before verb. We must be ready to understand how to perceive the verb. Also, it's special, this is special group of verbs that similar adverbs.

Can

Can is first in the order ... could is the second, also third is be able to. I know that could here for past form of the can, how one of two possible methods. And be able to is right for the past or future. But order say, that could must be before them.

• He can swim.
  
• He can't swim.
• Can he swim?
• How can he swim?
  

Can like for mark ability.

Could

Example: People or humans too, could not find survivors. Only for the past.

• ... could ...
  
• ... couldn't ...
  

Also questions possible to.

be able to

• ... will be able to ...
  
• ... won't able to ...
  
• ... was able to ...
• ...wasn't able to ...
  
• ... were able to ...
  
• ...weren't able to ..
  

Also questions possible to.

Order

What is the ability? Story describe dogs who can find anithing that people or humans can't ... They have ability as example. It works may be 10.000 years.

It looks like to understand it before use it in the present, or in the past, or the future.

Description: How can dog help us?

Answer define can I contunue or not. They are don't know. They are asking me or you.

Can, could, be able to ...

Now, I can be ready for write about this by the order, with content.

Picture

Humans on the picture move their look for the ..., or close their view, or use paper for this, or the first looks for the front.

People searching anithyng on the second picture, dog help for them.

The picture of the robot on the third.

In the historical order third is right to be last. Oh, yes, dog may help when people can't, but dogs may help when people with the open eyes ...

Robot

Hm, why does the robot help for the people? I think it's easy to understand ...

Question

Why are dog very good for find people?

Answer: they are can hear, see and smell much better than humans.

Oh, seven terms: how to

• Can is first, I understand that important for this, repeating, nature' legacy. Common terms for this.
• How is ability work? Could is right for it, because I must check previous experience.
  
• Group them by could / couldn't ... by name that include link to the order how to do it, that I know.
  
• Will be possible to say about who was/were able to, who will be able to, or not. Oh, yes. I should repeat this loop for use finally! ...

Hm ...

May be I must do anything ...

How to

• the can is first for define ability, may be around
  
• the could for searching past experience
• the was or were able to check past experience accurate, personality
  
• the be able to for personal or other accurate methods
• the will be able to may be better with completed future thetoric
  

Be going to

Single template for the future include three units: verb be, prepearing verb going, also to.

• verb be provide for me access to use it for many subbjects by the rules for verb be;
• prepearing verb going set different conditions ... Oh yes, different state for it in the past, present;
• also to lock the verb, exclude possibility for using it in many tense. I don't know so many about to, but I think it say that I'll may replace the verb in the future. May be no one time;
  

Hmmm ... it's three only.

Description

I'm goint to use magic.

How to

Example from description show that I can do it, by template going what is right in present continuous, but may include problems when it'll be in the past.

Verb use isn't right here ... May be yes, may be no ... What do you think?

I must exclude focus on the verb use, possible to change it. I must change it too, if.

Object is magic, terms from the vocabulary.cambridge.org:

1. the use of special powers to make things happen that would usually be impossible, such as in stories for children;
2. the skill of performing tricks to entertain people, such as making things appear and disappear and pretending to cut someone in half;
3. a special and exciting quality that makes something seem different from ordinary things;
4. Do anithing may be here;

Hmm ... may be third isn't bad now ... What do you think? High quality ... new of the ordinary thing, that is. Hm... may be it's possible too. It define to be possible.

What is important, verb must be right, must be replaced if, must be adaptive, must be ... .

Picture

It's about dragon ...Information from the pages 212, 45, 170 ....

One when vs. dragon, second when use magic may be, third when talk with him ... Hm... When I talk with him, dragon won't fight with me. Or I can meditate ... or It may be dangerous.

Which answer would you give?

Hmmm ... free place for the ... my answer here. If it isn't for childrens from the first term by vocabulary. I can use anithing else, that is real right for real deal.

4 terms

• I use it for predict based on that I know or see now;
• Often it's for may be immideately or very soon;
• In the next ... for plans or decisions;
• Possible to use present continuous to talk about plans or decisions;
  

Obligations

Oh, I can use be going to for replace present continuous with future meaning.

Yes, I'll be easy for avoid obligations, but define sentense as prediciton. Is it better? Hmmm ... Yes, I can change my plan with be going to, because I don't have obligations from the shop.

It looks right in the right places. I know about have to grammar unit, looks right to use be going to when: I don't have to be for anybody. I don't know about this now, but ... it's possible for this book. Units order isn't define strict.

Verbs

No modifications for verbs, but also infinitive to set conditions. I'll read about in the future ...

How to

• I can use it easy for planning or decisions to be done so fast;
• I can avoid obligations if it instead present continuous with future meaning;
• If I don't need to understand completely that I'm doing, for:
  
• Right way when I do anithing that I know, repeat usual;
• May be good for anithing that is important to be;
  

Present continuous with future meaning

First title that I find here similar for the sentence. But verb isn't here. Hmm ... When I don't have verb, I can choose tense first.

Yes, it's about how to be with this title. I know all of them for the past, present and only common for the future. In the previous unit I read that will isn't right for plans.

Don't make you plan with will, that is tip. Hm.. what can I do with this title. No. How is take this title? What is order for it?

Oh, in the order that I know from the previous unit. Wooman on right side of the picture is happy. I saw equal on the picture for the Present Continuous.

Wooman

On this picture she is looking for me. I see you face, but ... Affect of the blur make her face as picture. It change colors too.

She isn't real for public. It's mask.

With the future meaning

Yes, it's affect of this. Transformation ....I know how it may be, now.

Description

She is flying to Glasgow tomorrow. Ok, verb don't include mods here. It's about this wooman, maybe. Travel isn't easy ... It's right now and include a connection with the future.

It looks good. But she is happy only for the public. What is she feeling? ...

Yes, it's difficult when you have a plan for the future, that include obligation. Conditions what you must do and be ready for the specific time, make anything.

Hm... it may be differents ... But what is common, she have obligation for the future and must make your plans in order that is right for this future deal.

text

Text describe her diary ... Problem with lunch, two day on work ... And she'll be happy on thursday. It looks no bad ... but may be better. Yes. Why is she need this, when 16 years old? Who are your parents? Hmm ... It looks doutful. Is it happy on thursday?

Two terms & TIP

 

• Use for plans;
• Use for events;
• Use for statements;
• Use for another ...

But I must know time and place in the future. It's obligation in the future for me ... Possible to use goint to for upgrade it for ... Why is it here?

For thinking about this ... how will it work ... 

Question

Oh, thursday is free day for Lucy? Answer is true. It's future tencse. What is the plan of her parent for her future? Is it free day?

How to

I have an obligation for the future and must make my plans in order that is right for this future deal.