Will, shall, won't

Hmm... The order in the title isn't inanity. Will is first. Shall is second. Third is negative as one for two.

Order in title

I know from the book, that I can use it to define opinion about the future. Shall is only for official, the second, rare to use.

But won't is only third! Negative about the future is the last in this order ... Hmm ... I painted this. Negative it when I exclude one of the many ends in the present.

But I know that zero or absolute probability is very wrong. Also, I can't use another in the present where I isn't member of the event. Yes, If I'm doing anithing, I can say what is impossible easily. The better way is doing it, don't make prediciton.

For example. If I'm cooking soup the bad idea to thinking about ends where it won't be finished. I must cook for the right end. When I'm looking how anybody do it, the bad way to exclude any end. The conclusion here, that if I use probability.

I musn't exclude any end at first. I must find them, don't exclude any end before event won't finish.

Also, the official is the second ... The first is only opinion about ends.

Description

I hope you'll enjoy youga.

This is the opinion, nothing more. But only one. Hmm ... I know that many people write good about yoga. It define high chance for this opinion to be right.

I can say that sum of their probability is may be 30% ... Yes, it's about many opinion of people who don't like this and try it too. I exclude people who don't know about youga.

Also, sentense show that it's by advice. Yes, when I take this I can reject or accept. And I think 70% of people who accepted will enjoy youga.

Order again

I think what is right order for predict: write all is possible by using will, mark what is possible to be as shall, don't use won't before it ends. Is it right? How do it completely?

Story

Oh, in the story speaker say that yoga won't be easy in the second sentence =( Why? I think he is bad teacher ... Oh, sorry, he is who made description for the CD. Don't worry, it isn't right source to take information. I'm sure it may be easy.

Oh, in the middle of the text he write You won't want to stop. Serious, it's stupid. We can stop when we like it. Health isn't his problem, bad copywriter.

He use shall for the exercises ... Oh, it's right for contract, but not for it. It's very bad text.

He wasn't read the title ... Oh, bad text, very bad text.

Picture

Wooman on the picture with title easy yoga don't have problems. Why not? Do you think which is better: description with this conditions that set difficulties for you in the begin or easy yoga?

Lower case show that isn't common, little term ...

Question

This is a fitness. Yes, I think description from the fitness ...

Terms

• Will most usual way to talk about the future in English.
• It in the beging of the terms.

 

TIP #1

First tipe give the tip to exclude will for plans or arrangements .... Hm, May shall  be better? Do we need more? Yes, more grammar templates ... 

TIP #2

 

Shall with we is very formal British English ... Because it's difficult to say it before event ends.

Verbs

All verbs is right here ... No mods.

How to

 

Right order for predict: write all is possible by using will, mark what is possible to be as shall, don't use won't before it ends or I can do any of them.

When can I say won't about anithing and how much do I get from this?

Used to

Title include only grammar element how it write, without anithing else. Sick people often used to sleep in temples. In the description, example how to use it following the next ... 

Example don't include links for time, place, people, anithing else what can describe time. Yes, this is past form, but nothing about the time. I can see only keywords: sick, temples, often.

Withoud subject, verb and used to, also.

• [Different tense] Often is about statistics, we can use it when we don't like or can't say accurate;
• [Past] Temple is uncommon name for the buildings of the religions, now we know it's how cherch;
• [Different tense] Sick is about people who don't have a home in this context;

Without anithing, I have only one word that say about time indirectly. Yes, used to is for past ... But how to understand it from this exmaple? It's important because this is right example. It must be sufficient for.

It's tip when I can use used to, only one word temples define it.

Hmm ...

When?

• It's for the past;
  
• I haven't used word temples for my life. It defines first condition: use when subject or object in the past is unknown for me;
  
• Term #1: use it for show contrast between the past and the present, or when state or habits ends in the past;
  
• Term #2: Past simple can usually replace used to. I can exclude used to when I don't know keyword for it;
  

Did or didn't

When I need to make question or negative, I'll use did or didn't withoud difference with the past simple.

TIP

Little tip about practice say that ... people use used to instead of use in the questions and negatives. Yeasy to understand what if I know subject or object, I musn't know it when I want to ask anybody. When I like to say about past in negative.

• Directly question mean: Hey, man, I don't know about your opinion about this (subject or object), please give me the answer, this is a cause because I'm using used to instead of use.
• Directly negative mean: 

Example #1: Did you used to buy this rare car? If I'm thinking that it's in the past, to buy equal.

Example #2: I didn't used to buy this rare car. If I'm thinking that it wasn't right practice.

Hmm, I can use it for set accent what is uncommon now.

Picture & Practice

Acident Greeks on the picture is showing how to use it in common.

Question

Hm... no question on the bottom. The first doctor believed in magic. Oh, no used to here.

Why not? Magic is possible now, we don't know how to fly to the stars ... And don't know how to heal many diseases too.

Used to is right, but will be better to be accuracy with it.

How to

It's for the obsolite things.

I can use it if thinking that it's obsolite in the questions and negative. Example: Did you used to buy this rare car? I didn't used to buy this rare car.

Possible that past experience that looks wrong really isn't bad. The first doctor believed in magic.

Present perfect or past simple?

Description say that: The company has invented the Mac and the iPod. On the photo Steve Jobs who show new MacBook and I know that Apple inc. is working now.

Yes, Present Perfect is right there because is linking past invent, present and determine what in the future it will be too. I don't know how long, but easy to understand that it may many years.

Descriptions write about Steve Jobs biography, when he was born, how was learning at school, what was creating, etc. It's like for past continuous, but past simple is here and it isn't bad too when we don't like to explore his biography.

Book show different between person and things that he created. Company has worked since 1796 year, when new people continue his business. Also, animated studios Pixar has worked.

In the last term authors wrote that we can use any time by the point of view or by the context ...

Time expressions

For the Present Perfect:

• I have already made it!
• I haven't finished my learning yet.
  
• I have just finished my homework!
  
• I haven't ever been in London.
  
• I have never played tennis.
  
• I haven't tried oysters before.
  
• I have learned English since 2018 year.
  
• I have lived in Russia for [preposition] 37 years.
  

For the Present Simple:

• I visited pet's shop yesterday.
• I learned English last week.
• I drove a car 10 years ago.
• I play football when I was young.
  
• I learned Python then.
  
• I ended school in 2004 year.
  

These adverbs for describe verb at first, link to the past become accuracy. It's ordinary but I write it for remember.

How long

It has repeated many times. Yes, because when I take Present Perfect, I must think how many time I'm spending for it.

Present perfect 3

What is common. They have lived there for centures. It's show that short predict is possible here. Because if they lived, it's determine what tomorrow it must be true too. Oh, and more time.

 

I want to make example for each:

• positive, hidden, pas, with predict:
• I have tried to drive a car for ten years.
• positive, hidden, past, no predict:
• I have tried to drive a car.
• positive, hidden, present, with predict:
• I have tried drive a car for ten years but I'm still walker.
• positive, hidden, present, no predict:
• I have tried to drive a car but I'm still walker.
• positive, obvious, past, with predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test for ten years.
  
• positive, obvious, past, no predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test.
• positive, obvious, present, with predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test for ten years but I'm still walker.
• positive, obvious, present, no predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test but I'm still walker.
• negative, hidden, past, with predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car for ten years.
• negative, hidden, past, no predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car.
• negative, hidden, present, with predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car for ten years, I'm still walker.
• negative, hidden, present, no predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car but I'm still walker.
• negative, obvious, past, with predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test for ten years.
• negative, obvious, past, no predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test.
• negative, obvious, present, with predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test for ten years, I'm still walker.
• negative, obvious, present, no predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test but I'm still walker.

Common

Only one that is important here that is link for a past experience of driving. Also, that it take effect for a subject in the present time.

Since and for

Possble to use it when I like to say about period of time, example: for ten years. Since, when it's about the begining of time period.

How long ..., always

One question word here is how, but I know about many more of them. How long ... for ask about period of time. Also, one more adverb for use it.

Time

Many methods to check time period decribed here. But they aren't right for present, maybe usually.

Present perfect 2

Have you ever tried mustard ice cream? Hmmm . Did I make it? Did I try it? Formula is helpful but no, I didn't. I can make answer in the Present Perfect or use short answer or anithing else.

Which time is right to make this question?

Yes I think it determine this unit, cause when I need to do it ... What is common present perfect make link between past and present.

Question is request to check that link is exist.

Restaurant

Story describe restauran. Chef has become famous, he has made things that is uncommon. We have two opinion about it ... 

He saw, link is here, focus on the now!

Link is here too, focus on the now too!

First say about himself, secound about food. But they have negative opinion about it. Link here is negative experience of this place or information. They don't like it ... But I know from the story that many TV shows saw about it.

They didn't do anithing .. but link is here from the TV. Hmm ... Maybe TV show isn't right or maybe anithing of mustard ice cream is make it wrong, but include hidden cause that provide this negative link?

Yes, I'm about hidden, because mustard ice cream is funny for me and I don't see anithing important here. It doesn't provide link for me between it and my present.

But they see more in this and have token negative connection with this inforamtion. Will they have it in the future? Story don't show it. 

Using

Possible to take link that may be diffirence. Ever / never / before is helpful for describe verb, also.

Hm .. their place is right for common template, but phonetics determine place for each of them. I think.

TIP

Verb can determine that event don't end or ended, but don't include information about future.

How to 

 

The question is to check that a link exist.   

Present perfect 1

Hmm... They've already invented it. I wasn't understanding this description maybe half of the day. But picture take me key for it. People in the story talk about things that we know how modern. But thay talk about in the past many thousand years ago.

I can say today that We've already invented it. I'm about taxi, clocks too. That show how long may be time range for Present perfect. Also, two first tems say that focus may be on the past or on the present time.

 

 

No tense

I think possible to write it as:

• The taxi arrived, already // focus on the now
  
• The taxi arrived, finally // focus on the past

It's for show that common template is work and possible to use it too. But English like to use tenses more than it. Hmm ... ok, tenses determine time conditions by templates.

Negative

• I still haven't washed the dishes. // focus on the past
  
• I haven't washed the dishes, yet. // focus on the now
  

Regular ends

• most verbs, add -ed;
  
• when -e in end, add -d;
• when consonant and -y, delete -y and add -ied;
• when end single vowel and single consonant, double the consonant;
• when vowel and -y, add -ed [except pay, lay, say => paid, laid, said];
  
• when verbs ends vowel + consonant, double consonant + -ed [except if final syllable isn't stressed];
• when ends -l, double l + -ed [except North American English];

Irregular ends

 

Third form of the ends ... It's maybe equal for irregular past simple with all conditions.

Coomon

Each time Present perfect sets the connection between past and present. When an event isn't in the past, when it's affecting me now. If I feel it. There are two ways for set focus in this tense: for the past or for the present.

But if I can't unlink past and present, I must use it.

Feeling

No rules or terms here, only feeling. This time dangerous, unlimited obligations may be there. Shanke take me one tip more, how it may be when I will have many links in the present perfect. 

How to

Each time Present perfect sets the connection between past and present. When an event isn't in the past, when it is affecting me now. If I feel it.

There are two ways for set focus in this tense: for the past or for the present.

This time dangerous, unlimited obligations may be there. But if I can't unlink past and present, I must use it.

Past continuous

Unit of past continuous have short title. Hm... no full. No completed ... But the decription say that: Everyone was talking about the alligators.

Oh no, I didn't. Who did talk about it? I can enjoy with present continuous, but past continuous show me it: alligator, man who afraid it into the sewers. Hmmm .... 

Story about it show me what is cause. But question under set probability that this story is true. Wow. Difficult, maybe.

It's show that common use of past continuous is decripe past that include probability to be. Possible to explore it also for get right unswer. Yes it isn't old events that isn't possible to check. I know year when book was publishing and from the story I know about time marker for 1 year ago of it.

Past continuous is for anything that must be exploring, learning, etc. Because past simple include fact without timespan, include grammar tips and nothing more.

Past continuous is about timespan that decribed shortly. It's cause of it and place for exploration, learn, etc. Yes, grammar tips may help but don't replace full description.

Also, focus may change, that descripton in the right side of the picture is showing too:

Past continious may include past continuous: 

 

How to #1

• If a verb ends in -e, drop the -e [except: be]
  
• If a verb ends in one vowel and one consonant, double the consonant [except if final syllable isn't stressed]
  
• If a verb ends in -ee, append -ing
• If a verb ends in vowel + b, g, m, n, p, t, double consonant
• If a verb ends in -l, double l [North American english has one l]
  
• If a verb ends -ie, ie => y + ing

Comma

Hmm ... Comma is there. It's tip only ...

How to #2

 

When I want to describe a past period of time that includes more than one event or to show details of any event.

Past simple 3: irregular past forms

The description under formal title say: They spoke Celtic languages. The first question is Who did they be? I don't know. The second Which Celtic languages did they use? Third How is it be?

I don't know nothing about and I need maybe year for explore it for understand. Oh. Irregular verb describe this store. It determine action that is right to describe with irregular verbs.

In the present is right to use speak. But after many years it will be understandable. Oh yes, if you like to be on the page of historical book ... try anithing else. Don't speak. They won't understand it. Hm... Julia will look better on the historical pages.

Yes. I'll understandeble ... Hm.. But irregular verbs include many common deals that we are doing each day: eat, read, write, speak, sleep, do, be  ... 

Don't sleep

Omg, but I like it. Yes, in the future nobody won't write books about me: "How he slept". Hm, other verbs in the description irregular, also: speak, make, become, know, have, go, bring, become.

It's information about past actions that we can imagine, but can't write as fact. It's decribe it in genral too. No details, only historical description. Hmm ... this history similar for past regular form, but hidden details is impossible to check here. I can't ask these peoples, but I can ask Julia, maybe. She saw about it too.

Hmm... Irregular verb is here too. But she live now and possible to ask her. Only one different here ... All that she will say, will be in present tence, but after 10 minutes it's past irregular form ...

Hm...

Writing

Oh, I understand cause of so many books and cause when I learn English. Writing isn't right method for storage data, yes. We can't save all that we may needed as text. Because at some times anybody can say "Oh, I don't understand! I need more details!" ...

Book describe her act as live.

How to #1

Maybe irregular verbs is right for describe past when I don't have regular verb that is right term for past. 

Modifications

All irregular verbs is right in the present. But will modify when present will be past.

How to #2

• work => worked; // only marker
  
• learn => learned; // only marker
• live => lived; // marker + mods
  
• try => tried; // marker + mods
• read => read; // mods as no mods
  
• write => wrote; // mods
• be => was/were; //strong mods
  
• do => did; // strong mods

 

I know from the previous lessons that when verb include mods, tense isn't right for it. 

 

Hmm. ... it determine that all irregular verbs are right only for that is common now and won't be important in the future as the past. I musnt' say in the future: Oh no! I didn't … this right.

How to

 

All irregular verbs are right only for that is common now and won't be important in the future as the past. I musnt' say in the future: Oh no! I didn't … this right.

Past simple 2: regular past forms

Story about Julia

She lived in a tree. Common sentense that include story about she in the past. Oh, what is important for me who don't like learn by heart - many irregular verbs here.

Yes. I know about and I see that regular verb in the sentense that determine her story shortly. Regular is about anithing that happen often. It was live as we know it, nothing out of this. Hm...Maybe ... But why is maybe? It was two years! Yes, it's true!

Hmm... different between regular and irregular verb is clearly, but I think authors show what is mean here. Regular past form is for long events in the past for the people withou time limits.

It's possible to me 10 minutes ago and 10 years ago. Julia Butterfly Hill was born  in 1974, she is real woman ... 

She isn't Robin Hood with his team. No. She was one. She have opinion about nature to. I was for save 1.000 age tree. Hm...

Maybe it's all for show how to use past simple in regular past form. Oh, yes many adverb possible here.

did for all #1

Hmm... only one ver did for negative and questions. No difference for it ... All about past as one when we ask about or say not. Hm.... Present simple include some difference for it, but past no.

It isn't all here ...

What is in the end?

• most verbs, add -ed;
  
• when -e in end, add -d;
• when consonant and -y, delete -y and add -ied;
• when end single vowel and single consonant, double the consonant;
• when vowel and -y, add -ed [except pay, lay, say => paid, laid, said];
  
• when verbs ends vowel + consonant, double consonant + -ed [except if final syllable isn't stressed];
• when ends -l, double l + -ed [except North American English];

Hmm... many terms here, exceptions is here too. I use vocabulary that include around 10.000 verbs and 304 of them with ends that must modified to set -ied in the end.

Examples: tidy, cry, modify, pry, shy. 

Past is right for common events for the people in the past. Hmm, but examples isn't right as common for people.

did for all #2

Oh, if I have right verb isn't important ... I'll get good answer about anybody if I asked! Also I can use negative is verb isn't right.

• Did you tidy 2 last years?
• Did you cry 2 last years?
• Did you pry 2 last years?
• Did you shy 2 last years?

Conclusion

Wow. I think this is wrong to do it 2 last years. Verbs are common for past simple when it's regular past form. That I use each day by the present simple or by present continuous.

This form is helpful for understanding what is right to do now with prediction how it will look in the future as past. I have verbs that don't include modifications for the past form. They look good in the past form with markers only.

One thing

Verb live include little mod in the past form. What is it determine for the future?

How to

This form is helpful for understanding what is right to do now with prediction how it will look in the future as past. I have verbs that don't include modifications for the past form. They look good in the past form with markers only.

Past simple 1: was/were

Formal title. He was a popular hero. It's past. Is it nothing now? Description around the photo ask me "Was he a real man?" ... They don't know too.

Omg. What is subject of this theme? If I don't know. They don't know.

But it's here! Why?

Three titles

Header include photo and three titles with description. It's about was/were only that is form of verb be in the past. But unit 2 was about past too. Wow.

Ok. I'm man. I was man. It's easy. But if I talk about Robin Hood I can't say "He is" or "He was", because I don't know. Yes, it's true.

Description say that possible R.H. was born before his popularity in 13th centry. But it isn't fact. More question here than answers. But mean is dialog about him.

Merry Man, it was woman or man or both ... Maybe group of people. It's secret around of R.H.. Oh, past form of verb be include secrets. They were two or one ... I don't know.

Hmm... robbing rich people is cause. But in the next descriptions that isn't true. Oh. They were famous. But difficult to catch a cause. Maybe book was cause that is real true I think. But book published in 1883 year. R.H. was famous int 13th century.

How to #1

Past form of verb be include two form. We lose am for pronoun I ...

• I, he, she, it: was;
• You, we, they: were;

No personal verb for the past. Maybe it isn't important, right:

• I was young;
• He was young;
• She was young;
• It was past;

Yes. It's past. No difference now.

How to #2

 

Negative and questions are here. Also, using by their target by name. Negative for denial. Question for get sentense in the past. What is interes that you in the group with we/they:

• You were young;
• We were young;
• They were young;
  

You is common here. Because they is equal to use you many times. We is equal to say you many times where my person will absorb by group. This is provide for you to be common in this group.

Oh. Only one question now. What is defference between you and I, he, she, it? I can use you only in dialog. Where I'll say "I was young" or "You were young", forcus to show that we were different.

If I say about "He was young" in the dialog no differens with "I was young", because if I know so many about him I'm lose some about me. It's right for she/it too. Or it will be lie, because I don't know so many.

Model in the dialog

 

 

Model how I look for it. I think is no bad but may be better. May be more details needed. It's past. I made it for the be too.

 

It's wrong, task #2.

Imperatives

• by Cambrige University Press book 2011;
• by An English Grammar by W.M. BASKERVILL & J.W. SEWELL 1895;
• About me here;
• by Cambridge dictionary too;

Stay calm! Without worry, placeful ... Title is long but it's only one word. Hm... Man on the photo on the right side say "Stay calm!" too. I remember it, maybe it's important here more than anithing else.

Cause is earthquake that possible to be dangerous. Hmm ... only verb is common here, object is optional, but may be skipping. Subject place is empty ... 

No noun, pronoun ... no subject ... Verb isn't changeble ... object is optional. Hmm ... It's easy each time, because imperative exclude obligations and include only action as common.

Yes, earthqueake is not prevent now. But know what it's nature and know some how to be it it will come.

Common

• no personal obligations. Use please to be polite and take obligations;
• we know cause, it's nature affect;
  
• we know how it work, but isn't accurate;
• we know only verb without focuse on any group of them;

Yes, I think it's all that is common of the Imperatives. Also, verbs will coming in the next parth of the book. May be details of the verbs will help for understand Imperatives better.

It's infinitive here.

Always and never may used for say about previous experience.

Possible to be negative. It's for stop wrong activity that is possible, usually.

Subject is possble. But it add obligations, make it nearly of the present simple.

Do I need to make present simple as imperative? Yes, if nature affect is more understanding. Imperative may be transform into the present simple.

Scheme

• No time conditions: infinitive only;
  
• If have experience: use isn't accurate always or never;
  
• If know about famous action that isn't right but possible: use negative don't;
• If need to give obligation away: use please;
  
• If anybody can take obligation: use subject;
• Present simple will may be in the end;
  

It's right for nature affect where research didn't finish. Also, at some time where all conditions aren't clear but need to say or write anything. Is it needed?

Imperatives have a cause: palce, another event, action, statement, people, nature affect, etc.Cause is more common to  make or upgrade imperative to present simple.

Hmmm ... It's my opinion, I have finished present tense.

Stay calm!

Does it be right there?

Symbolic

I know about symbolic imperatives, example: "Danger!". No verb here, but it's equal to "Don't come near!". Maybe it's they are or not, but it's nearly.

How to

Listen to it if an alternative isn't possible. There isn't a complete answer here. Hidden cause is common. It may be present simple after justified upgrades. Use it too if I must.

Present continuous and present simple

• by Cambrige University Press book 2011;
• by An English Grammar by W.M. BASKERVILL & J.W. SEWELL 1895;
• About me here;
• by Cambridge dictionary too;

Wow. Title show that PS and PC as one ... Terms present some conditions how to use it usually. It's common about comparison. Hm... Simple conservation here ... Are they equal? Can I change dialog?

Dialog

They are speaking about ... What is mean here? What is defferent for each sentence?

Original

• He: Excuse me, do you speak English? // begin dialog
  
• She: Yes, I do. // apply it
  
• He: I'm going to the Eiffel Tower but I'm lost. // he enjoy
  
• She: Are you walking or driving? //she too
  
• He: I'm walking - I don't have a car. //he enjoy
  
• She: Good. I never drive in Paris. The traffic is terrible. // she change theme ...
  

Mirror

• He: Excuse me, are you speaking English? // he enjoy from begining
  
• She: Yes, I am. // she apply
  
• He: I go to the Eiffel Tower but I'm losing. //he no need tower ... he like exploration
  
• She: Do you walk or drive? // formal question
  
• He: I walk - I'm not having a car. //he enjoy without car's obligation
  
• She: Good. I'm never driving in Paris. The traffic is terrible. // she thinking about driving in positive way
  

 

Formal

Hmm... if I look for it I can see where he or she enjoyed and where is formal. Maybe it's only one here ...formal present simple for say, question for begin dialog. Negative for stop it isn't present here.

Many different ways is possible here, but:

• Present simple is easy formal, it's for neutral sentiment;
  
• Present simple question not for regular, it's for begining, negative is for stop;
• Look as 3th person isn't easy;
• Any verbs is more difficult than other;

 

• Present continuous for positive talk;
  
• Present continuous don't set obligations;
• It's include very difficult exceptions;
• It's include other exceptions too;

Common

 

• Present simple for regular, repeated events. With frequency adverb before verb, also;
• Present continuous for describe unfinished activity or that is in progress now;
• We rarely using present continuous for verbs which are about states, not actions: know, love, like, etc;
  

My opinion

 

If present simple is possible without ends under terms or present continuous with simple +ing, use it one or both. Don't use any verb that no right for both.

Present continuous

•  by Cambrige University Press book 2011;
• by An English Grammar by W.M. BASKERVILL & J.W. SEWELL 1895;
• About me here;
• by Cambridge dictionary too;

Simple title, no mystery. It's looking temporarily ... She's wearing a bring yellow dress. 

What is wear? It's temporarily for different result. Yes it's many better than present simple, looks good.

Yes, it's right when I don't like to get obligation. Only around now and nothing more. Right and easy tense for every day I think.

She can change it today, tomorrow. Hm... Conservation show what is true. They saw many but it's only about now. Many temporary deal is here. They are coming one by one and isn't stopping Mark and Monica.

be

It looks as verb be, but include additional verb with end to mark it as present continuous. Yes, it's creating one action at the moment by anybody withou obligations. Evolution of the verb be.

"Two" irregular ends

• If a verb ends in -e, drop the -e [except: be]
  
• If a verb ends in one vowel and one consonant, double the consonant [except if final syllable isn't stressed]
  
• If a verb ends in -ee, append -ing
• If a verb ends in vowel + b, g, m, n, p, t, double consonant
• If a verb ends in -l, double l [North American english has one l]
  
• If a verb ends -ie, ie => y + ing

Oh, terms coming here too. They are show what no all verb is right for it ... Why not? I have some about present simple where I can get problem with verbs that is right for he/she/it.

But here ends is diffirent with previous experince. I should check it apart ... Pronoun not important here, focus on the verb.

Wooman in the right side of the picture enjoy her talk. May it be wrong if I'll use verbs where end is difficult? Hmm ...

Hmm... I have new verbs group what need to be ... for understand how to use it.

Present continuous: Subject am / is / are + verb + ing;

Yes, be will alternative for adverb here. It's verb's description. For example: He is coming. Now "is" describe verb "coming", because he is doing it by his manner.

Difficult

I got four: die, lie, tie, untie ... Their end is many difficult than other. Do anybody enjoy within them? What is common - strict point. All of them about point ... die and lie not about engjoy, yes. But what is tie/untie? It's pair.

Hmm... I'm untying ... . I'm tying ... . Yes, I understand that it's possible to be right or not but each time it's changeble. It's easily for die and lie.

At sometimes tie is right. But it possible to be wrong. Untie, also.

I should use it at the right moment... 

Attention needed, don't enjoy here. Oh, what is so real good, that untie is after tie. Order say what anithing must be tied for allow untie for it. Also, tie is diffucult to do ...

Easy way don't tie that is difficult to do. I can untie if I know where it tied.

Hmm... Oh, terms include many secrets. Yeah, I don't like them.

Coomon

Can I use these four verbs within present continuous? Oh, no it isn't right! Two simple, but I'll exclude problem for me and don't use tie/untie. I won't know ever about tie/untie ... can I unjoy of it or not.

Hmmm... It's so real common here.

Don't worry, be happy. It's good idea. Use present continuos where it's right.

Oh, and one moment. Possible to enjoy and exclude grammar terms if it looks good for me.This is no rules, only terms. Canadian people know about it.

Sleepping isn't right. Sleeping is right.

How to

If present simple is possible without ends under terms or present continuous with simple +ing, use it one or both. Don't use any verb that is not right for both.

Present simple #2: negatives and questions

• by Cambrige University Press book 2011;
• by An English Grammar by W.M. BASKERVILL & J.W. SEWELL 1895;
• About me here;
• by Cambridge dictionary too;

Hm... I'm coming to negatives and questions with little conclusion:

 

I use present simple statements when I don't have another better quality. Exclude it when -s needed. Verb be is the right alternative for present simple.

 

I may use it when the rule for -s end is easy.

 

Others aren't my competent or ability, overspending obligations. Because my opinion will be inability. I can avoid wrong secrets too when exclude strong focus on the subject. What is needed to make a high quality opinion, also I must do a job to rate anybody's job too.

 

Is it good idea to work so hard?

Do you like zoos? It's for description ... Oh, title is formal again. I wanna do little explorations to understand what is here.

I have little tip, web browser is source of information here. It's from the web site ... Hm ... What is real make it as one - all data from the picture on the web site.

 

Hmm... Do authors "say" that I should use it on the similar places? Hm ... Questions is simple. Only three terms about it. They are short. But what can I get? Only present simple as common ... nothing more =(

Show

They show it for public, but can show more. If I'll send email for them... They saw how many they spending for it too. It's right. Simple description by present simple. I don't see details ... I don't understand what is going on. Nothing ...  

 

Common here is gorillas who need help.

I can ask about. I can describe it too. What is better here? What do you think?

Hm... They are asking too. Where they can't say ... because they want to get my or your opinion. Yes. But if I wanna do it. I can use anithing else. No rules what only present simple is possible for answer. I can say: "Hmm... I have a good idea", and use anithing else. Change theme. Question only for begin dialog.

Negative

 

Where is place for negative here? For negative what include verb as action without time limits ... Where is place for negative here?

On the right top I think. It isn't obligation. Also if I don't like monkeys I can say: I don't like to read it. Why not? I read.

I know about monkeys something that don't know before. When I have a fact. No negative. Maybe questions.

Oh. Maybe, it's all about present simple. It isn't all about monkeys.

Present simple #1: statements

•  by Cambrige University Press book 2011;
• by An English Grammar by W.M. BASKERVILL & J.W. SEWELL 1895;
• About me here;
• by Cambridge dictionary too;

Hmm... I'm going to learn first statement of present tense. But I got maybe under title at first. Wow it's nice. I haven't began statement but I have probability after less than one minute. Oh.

But I must remember what it's about present simple! It don't include conditions about time.

Maybe

Oh. All here will be under the maybe slogan. Hmm... all pictures about girls for boys. But where is it for girls? Do girls know anithing? Hm... It's interesting... 

Do they want beautiful boys? What do they want? Hmm... I know one film "What women want". This question is difficult, but cinema production try to make answer.

"What men want" is the second film, budget say what more women's secrets is more popular that men's secrets.

Oh. But I know what all secrets is interestion only when they are secrets. It determine cause why girls on the picture.

Girls like it, it's popular. Also, I won't search answer for break secret. Secret will be wrong when it has broken =/ What is the secret here? Do you ready for it?

Know

It's more funny than all what I know from this book. lol. How is it possbile to know girl who is model for photo where I'm or anybody learn English by this book???

Omg.

About

I read text about Layla. Oh, yes, I don't know her. It's impossible really. But if I'll think about girls and exlcude mathematics, chance may be increase. But mathematics say it's really no chance.

Yes, 0.000000001% possible, but is it important?

Only content makers know Layla if story about her is true.

Present Simple, statements

Oh. I understand more what is Present Simple ... Crude title is official here.

Yes. It's possible, but present simple statements don't present accuracy information.

Predictable what question will present equal results.

A sssssssnake never sleepsssssss

 

Omg. What is it? It's mystery. I copy it from book, because I like this mystery. Hm ...

Hm ... It's a key for understand s ... Better will be do it in the right order. Step by step.

• It's about verb. Action.
  
• It's about changes for action by append s in the end.
  
• It's only small marker ... easy to skip it ...
  
• It's need when I look for the action as 3th person!
• Example is making strong focus on the begin of subject and to the end of verb.
• It's about subject what I choose and about that will be in the end of the action... 
• I must be carefull with snakes... Snakes never sleeps.

Conclusion: focus on the subject will be helpful. Check what is it, who is he or she. Before ... What is will result?

How to

 

Yes. I have filter for all ends. It's a good news. Do I need all of them? I have nice filter here. Can I use verbs with only simple ends? If I can, obligations to write it right won't be my, but I'll lose ... 

 

What do I lose? I'll lose only opportunity say about people or it my opinion about how they do anithing. But only for strict list of verbs.

 

But It won't be accuracy, only maybe right, because it's present simple, only.

 

Is it important to use all verbs? Do I need learn by heart all of them? Hm... It looks no predictable easy ...

Table, hmm...

• If end is -o, -ch, -sh, -ss, -x => add es;
• If end is consonant + -y => drop -y and add -ies;
• if end is vovel + -y => add -s only;
• have => he has;

OMG!

Omg! I think what I need exclude these rules ... Because it isn't important. I can use better tenses to say accuracy about anithing.

I'll remember them while reading or listening sources who write by grammar terms right.

It isn't one obligation to write it right, it's about possible obligations to take anithing what I don't need.

Yeah, Yeah. I must be careful. It's English languange. When does present simple look good? When nobody can't say or write better ...

 

 

Conclusion

 

Yes. Scheme works. But I have problem with another ways ... When I can say It works, I lose competent people and will do anithing without ability ... Wow.

I see it isn't good out of grammar. But it's easy for begining ...

 

Examples

 

I can use be for replace it. If difficult to find verb, will be easily to say about state by use famous word or term.

It's previous theme. Easy, but it works NO => it simple grammar knowledge. Don't use verb where will be better to use noun.

 

Difference in the word type. I can get noun what is nearly for constant easily than verb that nearly for the action. Action is more difficult for predict.

If I like to say: He make anithing wrong. NO! Will be better to say only his public statements, refuse of searching the verb or don't do anithing.

Has

It's exceptional for it. Verb will change for uncommon and understandable state.

How to

It isn't bad to begin, usually. I use present simple statements when I don't have another better quality. Exclude it when -s needed. Verb be is the right alternative for present simple with a famous or accurate object. I can use the object again as the subject.

Be

Hm... common question is simple. But what is answer? Yes, I think is title, permanently state. Simple story and dialog show what King Henry VIII don't know who is his son. King ask about the clothes. He don't worry about the son.

Only one that is problem here. It's about King Henry VIII, I didn't read "The Price and the Pouper". But it's show how is it possible. How be may be present.

 

Hm, one moment. King use be in the questions about son and about true, and in the statements about clothes. It was King Henry VIII.

 

I look for the picture on the left side and see what one boy have good clothes. Second have cheap. But now is 2024, that determine new rules for style. Omg, anybody can do it, no need to be King.

 

OMG

I imagine how many forms of be is possble. It's unit for sentence template. 

How to

 

In the book it's present in the present tense and they aren't past how in the history. It provide description for many statements:

• The Prince is ...
• The Pauper is ...
• The King is ...
• They are ... (Prince and Pauper)  
• They are ... (Prince and King)  
• They are ... (King and Pauper) 
  
• Each person can say about anithing It is ... 
• Each person can say I am ... 

 

Model in the dialog

 

But in the past ... 

• We are >  They are; because if all people on the planet = We are, I can say they are only about all people withou me;
• You are may be in we are or in they are;
• he/she/It is may be in many places;
• I am is personal for each person of English language grammar;
  

It's wrong, task #2.

World class and world order #A #1

Hm... I read all terms and look for the title. Order and worlds class is as one... Hmm... Do world class determine their order or their order determine class?

If I think about enithing, I'll have the name firts. And I'll set place for it in the second step. If I don't have anythink on the place where I need it, I will search it for this place.

Sentence include:

• subject;
• verb;
• adjective for describe a noun;
• adverb for describe a verb;
• object;

 

World order

 

singular adjective Subject [noun or pronoun] ... Verb  ... singular adjective Object, adverb

Italic shows what is for description. Bold is for common. Three dots for:

• Maybe it is reference between Verb and Object;

• Examples: in, on, into, over, above;

• Maybe it is alternative for adverb between Subject and Verb;

• Examples: be going to, used to, can, should, etc;

In the world today

Hmm... Common description say about it... May be anything is possible describe with only this template that I can't finish. But who can finish it?

Right Bottom

It's simple picture. I can understand what dog is sleeping. But I can't understand who fly over the dog. Yes, dog is sleeping but his lips say that not all is so easy... Is it possible to describe all with this template?

Oh, world in the left. It's easy. Ok, oh.

 

Black background and some stats. Oh, I must to be careful. No all is possible.

Black infinity vs. language when world wanted... but language of combinatorics is black hole too. Also, infinity is only image I think. Nobody don't know how do it work?

I must be careful or I will be careful, sure or I'm careful, ok or ... . Hm... Template is works ... But for say it without must I can use should or can I find the right adverb to exclude should? 

 

Hmm... maybe some changes, find noun for object, too! New adverb for describe form of verb to be:

• I'm careful writer, ok.
• I'm careful writer.
• I'm careful writer, ???.

When I do it focus move for the verb, measure of object and to the object also. Description of the verb will take minimum priority. Hmm... but result is important, not important HOW DOES IT HAPPEN! If I write text slowly. I write text impressive. I write text clearly. NOT IMPORTANT HOW!

Result is important.Hm... but how I can use adverb right... for get profit... hmmm... I don't take obligations by grammar terms! I'm free...

• I'm careful writer, ???.

 

Fox

 

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. It's include all 26 english alphabet letters.

 

Hmm... It's include all letters, but don't show all details. Simple about what letters isn't all what is common in the language. It's easy. I'm reading up and see many statistics what maybe can say anithing... 

 

I don't have another for comparison and I'm loking for it fluently.

Oh, yes. Question in the end ask about statistics. I can get answer above. English is first language for 350 millions people.

 

The book wrote in 2011, but today 14.11.2024 and google say that for 360 million people English is first language.

Question tags #A #32

The doctor in the right side of the picture. Hmm... I skip title and move to the common question.  

Chocolate is bad for you, is not it?

If doctor ask, she know that anithing isn't right. But she don't know what is it. Chocolate is one what is like childrens, what she know and what may be source of problems.

This is key for dialog or thinking, where is problem. Also, question tag exclude difficult question what. Because this question is request for hidden information and answer will be modified. Also, answer will include key what doctor don't know, maybe.

Question tags is helpful in difficult conservations with hidden information... But it's only one question. This is not result, cause isn't clearly.

Hm... I maybe know some about. I learn managament in Russia. It's nearly of A/B tests or hypothesis tests. What is diffeternt, managers do if for the market. Large amount of people because they can't ask each of them. But doctor work with each person.

History

"I hope you have not killed him?" said Amyas.—Kingsley.

Oh. It's Indirect Discourse from An English Grammar Book. It's ask for get hidden information, but it isn't doctor... No. Hmm... It's out of grammar completely. No important how it wrote, how it write or will write and all other. I must say it right for result.

An English Grammar take more.

Picture

It's only picture, no scheeme or anithing else. Only picture. I don't know right how it works now. But I see what it's include many different target for use. Yes, I think is more about targets. No about result.

Anything will be when target have done. It may be right or wrong. Hmm... I'm thinking that additional ability is need here. It's form for it. Ability that include terms how to use it right ...

Can I use it right...

Hmm... In the common question, doctor use it. Maybe it isn't for children and no for me too. En English Grammar present example by Charles Kingsley, who was author. And it about govenement non public work. All show what It may no easy... Use it.

Practice

No. I think no. It won't get result. Its' about peoples who have high qualification or prepared method for their common qualification what be helpful in ordinary situations. I need qualification what include these methods for allow using it right.

Model

Hmm... but what mathematics model is right here?

I don't know but possible to show it simplify as tree. Hmm... This is impossible now I think because it's key for get knowledge about all what we can describe and what is into our or what we made.

Also, it key for better methods to do it without descriptions. It won't work for the nature around, we can describe it but stone don't answer if I ask him =(

Oh... It's seriously impossible for me now. I have come to difficult task here what is not for the A1 English learning level.

p.s. I like this task for the future. It's include different answers for important questions. Oh, but need to do it again.

So and naither #A #31

So and naither is as one. Hmm... example:

• A: I like it.
• B: So do I.

• A: I don't like it.
• B: Neither do I.

Answer isn't questions but question in the words order. If I read this I see it, but if I listening I don't understand question this or statement... It's probability. How to understand it? I can divide it and calculate:

• How chance is B asking? (X)
  
• How chance is B saying? (1 - X)
  
• How chance is B like it? (Y)
  
• How chance is B not like it? (1 - Y)
• How chance is B like enithing else? (Z)
• How chance is B not like enithing else? (1 - Z)

Probability in the brackets. Hm. I look for it and understand what is important here. Only A determine all what B will do. Yes, I don't know how to calculate X or Y or Z now, but I know where is cause.

Need to change statement for exclude probability. It's about childrend for childrens. How to say about. Not bad for exlude difficult answers for question what isn't important now.

This mark answers for all. It's easy to understand on the picture what show public chatroom. It's for teens only.  Two key so and neither in the begining of the sentence show it all time.

How to

I can use two keys so and neither as mark in the beginning of the sentence for understand what is no answer for me. This is a message that my question determined. It's right for childrens only.

I can understand what question was wrong easily. Possible to do it clearly in the family.

It's the only key, method showing, maybe ruled strictly, temporarily completed.