Will, shall, won't

Hmm... The order in the title isn't inanity. Will is first. Shall is second. Third is negative as one for two.

Order in title

I know from the book, that I can use it to define opinion about the future. Shall is only for official, the second, rare to use.

But won't is only third! Negative about the future is the last in this order ... Hmm ... I painted this. Negative it when I exclude one of the many ends in the present.

But I know that zero or absolute probability is very wrong. Also, I can't use another in the present where I isn't member of the event. Yes, If I'm doing anithing, I can say what is impossible easily. The better way is doing it, don't make prediciton.

For example. If I'm cooking soup the bad idea to thinking about ends where it won't be finished. I must cook for the right end. When I'm looking how anybody do it, the bad way to exclude any end. The conclusion here, that if I use probability.

I musn't exclude any end at first. I must find them, don't exclude any end before event won't finish.

Also, the official is the second ... The first is only opinion about ends.

Description

I hope you'll enjoy youga.

This is the opinion, nothing more. But only one. Hmm ... I know that many people write good about yoga. It define high chance for this opinion to be right.

I can say that sum of their probability is may be 30% ... Yes, it's about many opinion of people who don't like this and try it too. I exclude people who don't know about youga.

Also, sentense show that it's by advice. Yes, when I take this I can reject or accept. And I think 70% of people who accepted will enjoy youga.

Order again

I think what is right order for predict: write all is possible by using will, mark what is possible to be as shall, don't use won't before it ends. Is it right? How do it completely?

Story

Oh, in the story speaker say that yoga won't be easy in the second sentence =( Why? I think he is bad teacher ... Oh, sorry, he is who made description for the CD. Don't worry, it isn't right source to take information. I'm sure it may be easy.

Oh, in the middle of the text he write You won't want to stop. Serious, it's stupid. We can stop when we like it. Health isn't his problem, bad copywriter.

He use shall for the exercises ... Oh, it's right for contract, but not for it. It's very bad text.

He wasn't read the title ... Oh, bad text, very bad text.

Picture

Wooman on the picture with title easy yoga don't have problems. Why not? Do you think which is better: description with this conditions that set difficulties for you in the begin or easy yoga?

Lower case show that isn't common, little term ...

Question

This is a fitness. Yes, I think description from the fitness ...

Terms

• Will most usual way to talk about the future in English.
• It in the beging of the terms.

 

TIP #1

First tipe give the tip to exclude will for plans or arrangements .... Hm, May shall  be better? Do we need more? Yes, more grammar templates ... 

TIP #2

 

Shall with we is very formal British English ... Because it's difficult to say it before event ends.

Verbs

All verbs is right here ... No mods.

How to

 

Right order for predict: write all is possible by using will, mark what is possible to be as shall, don't use won't before it ends or I can do any of them.

When can I say won't about anithing and how much do I get from this?

Used to

Title include only grammar element how it write, without anithing else. Sick people often used to sleep in temples. In the description, example how to use it following the next ... 

Example don't include links for time, place, people, anithing else what can describe time. Yes, this is past form, but nothing about the time. I can see only keywords: sick, temples, often.

Withoud subject, verb and used to, also.

• [Different tense] Often is about statistics, we can use it when we don't like or can't say accurate;
• [Past] Temple is uncommon name for the buildings of the religions, now we know it's how cherch;
• [Different tense] Sick is about people who don't have a home in this context;

Without anithing, I have only one word that say about time indirectly. Yes, used to is for past ... But how to understand it from this exmaple? It's important because this is right example. It must be sufficient for.

It's tip when I can use used to, only one word temples define it.

Hmm ...

When?

• It's for the past;
  
• I haven't used word temples for my life. It defines first condition: use when subject or object in the past is unknown for me;
  
• Term #1: use it for show contrast between the past and the present, or when state or habits ends in the past;
  
• Term #2: Past simple can usually replace used to. I can exclude used to when I don't know keyword for it;
  

Did or didn't

When I need to make question or negative, I'll use did or didn't withoud difference with the past simple.

TIP

Little tip about practice say that ... people use used to instead of use in the questions and negatives. Yeasy to understand what if I know subject or object, I musn't know it when I want to ask anybody. When I like to say about past in negative.

• Directly question mean: Hey, man, I don't know about your opinion about this (subject or object), please give me the answer, this is a cause because I'm using used to instead of use.
• Directly negative mean: 

Example #1: Did you used to buy this rare car? If I'm thinking that it's in the past, to buy equal.

Example #2: I didn't used to buy this rare car. If I'm thinking that it wasn't right practice.

Hmm, I can use it for set accent what is uncommon now.

Picture & Practice

Acident Greeks on the picture is showing how to use it in common.

Question

Hm... no question on the bottom. The first doctor believed in magic. Oh, no used to here.

Why not? Magic is possible now, we don't know how to fly to the stars ... And don't know how to heal many diseases too.

Used to is right, but will be better to be accuracy with it.

How to

It's for the obsolite things.

I can use it if thinking that it's obsolite in the questions and negative. Example: Did you used to buy this rare car? I didn't used to buy this rare car.

Possible that past experience that looks wrong really isn't bad. The first doctor believed in magic.

Present perfect or past simple?

Description say that: The company has invented the Mac and the iPod. On the photo Steve Jobs who show new MacBook and I know that Apple inc. is working now.

Yes, Present Perfect is right there because is linking past invent, present and determine what in the future it will be too. I don't know how long, but easy to understand that it may many years.

Descriptions write about Steve Jobs biography, when he was born, how was learning at school, what was creating, etc. It's like for past continuous, but past simple is here and it isn't bad too when we don't like to explore his biography.

Book show different between person and things that he created. Company has worked since 1796 year, when new people continue his business. Also, animated studios Pixar has worked.

In the last term authors wrote that we can use any time by the point of view or by the context ...

Time expressions

For the Present Perfect:

• I have already made it!
• I haven't finished my learning yet.
  
• I have just finished my homework!
  
• I haven't ever been in London.
  
• I have never played tennis.
  
• I haven't tried oysters before.
  
• I have learned English since 2018 year.
  
• I have lived in Russia for [preposition] 37 years.
  

For the Present Simple:

• I visited pet's shop yesterday.
• I learned English last week.
• I drove a car 10 years ago.
• I play football when I was young.
  
• I learned Python then.
  
• I ended school in 2004 year.
  

These adverbs for describe verb at first, link to the past become accuracy. It's ordinary but I write it for remember.

How long

It has repeated many times. Yes, because when I take Present Perfect, I must think how many time I'm spending for it.

Present perfect 3

What is common. They have lived there for centures. It's show that short predict is possible here. Because if they lived, it's determine what tomorrow it must be true too. Oh, and more time.

 

I want to make example for each:

• positive, hidden, pas, with predict:
• I have tried to drive a car for ten years.
• positive, hidden, past, no predict:
• I have tried to drive a car.
• positive, hidden, present, with predict:
• I have tried drive a car for ten years but I'm still walker.
• positive, hidden, present, no predict:
• I have tried to drive a car but I'm still walker.
• positive, obvious, past, with predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test for ten years.
  
• positive, obvious, past, no predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test.
• positive, obvious, present, with predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test for ten years but I'm still walker.
• positive, obvious, present, no predict:
• I have tried to pass driving test but I'm still walker.
• negative, hidden, past, with predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car for ten years.
• negative, hidden, past, no predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car.
• negative, hidden, present, with predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car for ten years, I'm still walker.
• negative, hidden, present, no predict:
• I haven't tried to drive a car but I'm still walker.
• negative, obvious, past, with predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test for ten years.
• negative, obvious, past, no predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test.
• negative, obvious, present, with predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test for ten years, I'm still walker.
• negative, obvious, present, no predict:
• I haven't tried to pass driving test but I'm still walker.

Common

Only one that is important here that is link for a past experience of driving. Also, that it take effect for a subject in the present time.

Since and for

Possble to use it when I like to say about period of time, example: for ten years. Since, when it's about the begining of time period.

How long ..., always

One question word here is how, but I know about many more of them. How long ... for ask about period of time. Also, one more adverb for use it.

Time

Many methods to check time period decribed here. But they aren't right for present, maybe usually.

Present perfect 2

Have you ever tried mustard ice cream? Hmmm . Did I make it? Did I try it? Formula is helpful but no, I didn't. I can make answer in the Present Perfect or use short answer or anithing else.

Which time is right to make this question?

Yes I think it determine this unit, cause when I need to do it ... What is common present perfect make link between past and present.

Question is request to check that link is exist.

Restaurant

Story describe restauran. Chef has become famous, he has made things that is uncommon. We have two opinion about it ... 

He saw, link is here, focus on the now!

Link is here too, focus on the now too!

First say about himself, secound about food. But they have negative opinion about it. Link here is negative experience of this place or information. They don't like it ... But I know from the story that many TV shows saw about it.

They didn't do anithing .. but link is here from the TV. Hmm ... Maybe TV show isn't right or maybe anithing of mustard ice cream is make it wrong, but include hidden cause that provide this negative link?

Yes, I'm about hidden, because mustard ice cream is funny for me and I don't see anithing important here. It doesn't provide link for me between it and my present.

But they see more in this and have token negative connection with this inforamtion. Will they have it in the future? Story don't show it. 

Using

Possible to take link that may be diffirence. Ever / never / before is helpful for describe verb, also.

Hm .. their place is right for common template, but phonetics determine place for each of them. I think.

TIP

Verb can determine that event don't end or ended, but don't include information about future.

How to 

 

The question is to check that a link exist.   

Present perfect 1

Hmm... They've already invented it. I wasn't understanding this description maybe half of the day. But picture take me key for it. People in the story talk about things that we know how modern. But thay talk about in the past many thousand years ago.

I can say today that We've already invented it. I'm about taxi, clocks too. That show how long may be time range for Present perfect. Also, two first tems say that focus may be on the past or on the present time.

 

 

No tense

I think possible to write it as:

• The taxi arrived, already // focus on the now
  
• The taxi arrived, finally // focus on the past

It's for show that common template is work and possible to use it too. But English like to use tenses more than it. Hmm ... ok, tenses determine time conditions by templates.

Negative

• I still haven't washed the dishes. // focus on the past
  
• I haven't washed the dishes, yet. // focus on the now
  

Regular ends

• most verbs, add -ed;
  
• when -e in end, add -d;
• when consonant and -y, delete -y and add -ied;
• when end single vowel and single consonant, double the consonant;
• when vowel and -y, add -ed [except pay, lay, say => paid, laid, said];
  
• when verbs ends vowel + consonant, double consonant + -ed [except if final syllable isn't stressed];
• when ends -l, double l + -ed [except North American English];

Irregular ends

 

Third form of the ends ... It's maybe equal for irregular past simple with all conditions.

Coomon

Each time Present perfect sets the connection between past and present. When an event isn't in the past, when it's affecting me now. If I feel it. There are two ways for set focus in this tense: for the past or for the present.

But if I can't unlink past and present, I must use it.

Feeling

No rules or terms here, only feeling. This time dangerous, unlimited obligations may be there. Shanke take me one tip more, how it may be when I will have many links in the present perfect. 

How to

Each time Present perfect sets the connection between past and present. When an event isn't in the past, when it is affecting me now. If I feel it.

There are two ways for set focus in this tense: for the past or for the present.

This time dangerous, unlimited obligations may be there. But if I can't unlink past and present, I must use it.

Past continuous

Unit of past continuous have short title. Hm... no full. No completed ... But the decription say that: Everyone was talking about the alligators.

Oh no, I didn't. Who did talk about it? I can enjoy with present continuous, but past continuous show me it: alligator, man who afraid it into the sewers. Hmmm .... 

Story about it show me what is cause. But question under set probability that this story is true. Wow. Difficult, maybe.

It's show that common use of past continuous is decripe past that include probability to be. Possible to explore it also for get right unswer. Yes it isn't old events that isn't possible to check. I know year when book was publishing and from the story I know about time marker for 1 year ago of it.

Past continuous is for anything that must be exploring, learning, etc. Because past simple include fact without timespan, include grammar tips and nothing more.

Past continuous is about timespan that decribed shortly. It's cause of it and place for exploration, learn, etc. Yes, grammar tips may help but don't replace full description.

Also, focus may change, that descripton in the right side of the picture is showing too:

Past continious may include past continuous: 

 

How to #1

• If a verb ends in -e, drop the -e [except: be]
  
• If a verb ends in one vowel and one consonant, double the consonant [except if final syllable isn't stressed]
  
• If a verb ends in -ee, append -ing
• If a verb ends in vowel + b, g, m, n, p, t, double consonant
• If a verb ends in -l, double l [North American english has one l]
  
• If a verb ends -ie, ie => y + ing

Comma

Hmm ... Comma is there. It's tip only ...

How to #2

 

When I want to describe a past period of time that includes more than one event or to show details of any event.